Geometry enhancements

[vhirtham]

Changes

Apply some small enhancements to the Geometry class. Most of them help to improve the readability/understandability of the new tutorials.

• create Geometry from a profile and extrusion length
• __init__ also accepts groove types
• add k3d as backend option to plot

Move to separate PR / issue

• support unit strings in interfaces
• OPTIONAL: Set pint wrapper to strict
• Add new triangulation algorithm (found one that works for all polygon types)

Checks

• updated CHANGELOG.rst
• updated tests
• updated doc/
• update example/tutorial notebooks
• update manifest file

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #583 (2736c61) into master (e011e4e) will decrease coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 70.73%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #583      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.83%   94.67%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          93       93              
  Lines        5745     5768      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits         5448     5461      +13     
- Misses        297      307      +10     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
weldx/geometry.py	97.89% <57.89%> (-1.17%)	⬇️
weldx/visualization/k3d_impl.py	78.68% <76.47%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
weldx/visualization/matplotlib_impl.py	90.78% <100.00%> (+0.12%)	⬆️
weldx/welding/groove/iso_9692_1.py	99.51% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e011e4e...2736c61. Read the comment docs.

[vhirtham]

Had a really annoying circular dependency in the docs only. It's gone now, but I might have overdone it at someplace. So if you see any unnecessary changes to the imports, let me know.

Most of the uncovered lines are plot-related and will be covered once the new tutorials go online. So I think there is no need for additional testing. However, I will add a short and simple test case for the groove support, just to have that covered by the basic tests.

[CagtayFabry]

Had a really annoying circular dependency in the docs only. It's gone now, but I might have overdone it at someplace. So if you see any unnecessary changes to the imports, let me know.

Most of the uncovered lines are plot-related and will be covered once the new tutorials go online. So I think there is no need for additional testing. However, I will add a short and simple test case for the groove support, just to have that covered by the basic tests.

imports look better now I guess (removing top level imports) 👍

did you do anything specific to fix this error? https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/pull/583/checks?check_run_id=3827087537#step:10:178
not sure why it sometimes keep popping up, should be unrelated here and my guess is some kind of wrong intersphinx loading

[vhirtham]

did you do anything specific to fix this error? https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/pull/583/checks?check_run_id=3827087537#step:10:178 not sure why it sometimes keep popping up, should be unrelated here and my guess is some kind of wrong intersphinx loading

Didn't try it so far, but busting those warnings "the right way" is extremely time-consuming. Try a fix and wait 5 minutes to see if it worked. If we want to get a warning-free build, I can just put it into the nitpick ignore. Is that okay?

[CagtayFabry]

did you do anything specific to fix this error? https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/pull/583/checks?check_run_id=3827087537#step:10:178 not sure why it sometimes keep popping up, should be unrelated here and my guess is some kind of wrong intersphinx loading

Didn't try it so far, but busting those warnings "the right way" is extremely time-consuming. Try a fix and wait 5 minutes to see if it worked. If we want to get a warning-free build, I can just put it into the nitpick ignore. Is that okay?

did you do anything specific to fix this error? https://github.com/BAMWelDX/weldx/pull/583/checks?check_run_id=3827087537#step:10:178 not sure why it sometimes keep popping up, should be unrelated here and my guess is some kind of wrong intersphinx loading

Didn't try it so far, but busting those warnings "the right way" is extremely time-consuming. Try a fix and wait 5 minutes to see if it worked. If we want to get a warning-free build, I can just put it into the nitpick ignore. Is that okay?

it's probably a good use for the nitpick ignore 👍