Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update spatial data schema #655
update spatial data schema #655
Changes from 11 commits
d84d5f3
ba9296f
08560e0
4969fcd
71df637
cc6ba02
5c48052
9ef411c
708cf70
f98bbb8
c1e98f6
1edd4dd
61c3e60
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seeing this gets me thinking (also in the context of the
GerericSeries
) that thewx_shape
validator should probably be able to deal with dimension names when used in conjunction with adata_array
schema. For example, instead of[..., 3]
we could write[..., c=3]
. The latter case would express "any number of dimensions with arbitrary shape, butc
must have shape(3,)
" I think this would simplify things a bit since we do not need to define a coordinate order to fulfill the requirement. Maybe we should give this a different name (wx_coordinate_shape
?) to avoid confusions.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agreed, in general I think it would be a good addition to have a powerful validator for xarray structures
the overall structure and implementation probably needs some planning
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should I create a new issue as reminder?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes that never hurts 😉