-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Humans_Engine: Update View Quality DocumentationURL #3216
Humans_Engine: Update View Quality DocumentationURL #3216
Conversation
@BHoMBot check required |
@al-fisher to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Links updated and have checked they work so am happy for this to be deployed for updates to alphas.
@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: dataset-compliance, unit-tests |
@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results. |
@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance |
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
Thanks @FraserGreenroyd |
@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge |
@al-fisher to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 9 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
Fixing the Documentation URLs to the Humans Engine View Quality Conventions
As part of the Documentation restructuring as per issue BHoM/documentation#85
I matched the new location of the Humans View Quality Conventions page to be both within the BHoM Engine documentation navigation and then with in the same Discipline Engine and Namespace of the methods being documented.
Which seems a logical approach. But as we expand our documentation - will be good to formalise (and document 😄) our documentation conventions further.
@travispotterBH @pawelbaran very relevant to our conversations around documentation long term strategy