Skip to content

Conversation

@BHoMBot
Copy link
Member

@BHoMBot BHoMBot commented Dec 19, 2024

Update assembly file version to 8.1.0.0
Update copyright headers to new year 2025

@BHoMBot BHoMBot added the type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines label Dec 19, 2024
@BHoMBot BHoMBot self-assigned this Dec 19, 2024
@michaelhoehn michaelhoehn removed the request for review from FraserGreenroyd December 19, 2024 14:42
@IsakNaslundBh
Copy link
Contributor

@BHoMBot check serialisation
@BHoMBot check project-compliance
@BHoMBot check null-handling

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2024

@IsakNaslundBh to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

  • check serialisation
  • check project-compliance
  • check null-handling

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2024

FAO: @adecler @pawelbaran @IsakNaslundBh
@IsakNaslundBh is seeking dispensation on this Pull Request to skip a required check. Please can you provide authorisation for the check to be skipped, or provide assistance as appropriate.

The check they wish to have dispensation on is project-compliance.

If you are providing dispensation on this occasion, please reply with:

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 34706125846

@IsakNaslundBh
Copy link
Contributor

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am authorising dispensation to be granted on check ref. 34706125846

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2024

@IsakNaslundBh I have now provided a passing check on reference 34706125846 as requested.

@IsakNaslundBh
Copy link
Contributor

Project compliance dispensated and issue raised #493

@IsakNaslundBh
Copy link
Contributor

@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: copyright-compliance

@bhombot-ci
Copy link

bhombot-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2024

@IsakNaslundBh I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results.

Copy link
Contributor

@IsakNaslundBh IsakNaslundBh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PRs have been reviewed by DevOps and are suitable for merge to uptick to the 8.1 milestone.

Reviewed together with
@pawelbaran

@IsakNaslundBh IsakNaslundBh merged commit 100d31d into develop Dec 20, 2024
4 checks passed
@IsakNaslundBh IsakNaslundBh deleted the BHoM-#1-Uptick8.1 branch December 20, 2024 12:49
@adecler adecler mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type:compliance Non-conforming to code guidelines

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants