Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for Bad Names #8

Open
jdeck88 opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Check for Bad Names #8

jdeck88 opened this issue Jul 15, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@jdeck88
Copy link
Member

jdeck88 commented Jul 15, 2020

We do not check for bad names:
(we do however check for OLD names on a recent commit).
In any case, report outright bad names into a file that could be linked to via the API (bad names by project). This would be mispelling. This reporting would be using the amphibiaweb taxonomy file so related to the synonym function just built in fetch.py

@mkoo
Copy link
Member

mkoo commented Jul 27, 2020

Not sure exactly the nature of bad names but we found a few in the latest dump (7/26)

In specificepithet ( removebad characters):

  • cranwelli (should be cranwelli)
  •  colymba (should be colymba)

In specificepithet (do not allow split or two values)

  • wehrlei jacksoni (where genus=Plethodon)
  • muscosa/sierrae (where genus-Rana)
    ideally these should be flagged upon uploading but I dont know if that's possible! For now may be remove the second specificepithet and stick in sample remarks?

(I will also note in the other repo to update better template instructions)

@jdeck88
Copy link
Member Author

jdeck88 commented Jul 27, 2020 via email

@mkoo
Copy link
Member

mkoo commented Jul 27, 2020

Please flag names that dont appear in the amphib_names file!

As for the weird character Â
I see it in the CSV, may be an excel artefact? It shows up associated with MaterialSampleID=140708_R12
now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants