Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we know why this fixes the error? I haven't thought about it much but if we don't have to create a copy, that's prob better right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, I guess it's not that a big of a deal bc if it was passed into
ak.array
was relatively smallThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yah it's exactly what I thought. when numpy does a transpose, it doesn't actually move any data around, it just takes the same base array in memory and switches it from
column_major
torow_major
or vice versa (I forget which one C used vs Fortran)When we do a deep copy, it actually allocates new memory and interprets it correctly. We don't have support for different orders with the current impl. We used to have it with
arrayview
but that had it's own mess of problems. I guess we could try to check if theOWNDATA
flag is false and then deep copy but idk if it's worth itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I'll just reference this comment in the issue for future reference and approve for now. I'll leave this unresolved so other reviewers can see it bc I think it kinda interesting. And i'd like to get other opinions