Improving the proxy docs for configuring with vllm #5184
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
1 task
|
hi @fozziethebeat curious do you use the LiteLLM proxy in production today ? |
|
We actually painfully wrote our own shim that does something vaguely similar for a while but turned it down because the two models we were running don't get too much usage. The next time I have that problem however I'd probably pick LiteLLM proxy now that I know it works so smoothly. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Title
Improving the proxy docs for configuring with vllm
Relevant issues
Fixes #5183 5183
Type
📖 Documentation
Changes
Small markdown changes
[REQUIRED] Testing - Attach a screenshot of any new tests passing locall
Skipped given just documentation changes.