Create GitHub Action to automatically build docker images

[coconut49]

Hi there,

I wanted to let you know that this PR is essentially the same as #634. However, I regret to inform you that I had misconfigured the Github Pull App, which caused the changes to be purged by the Pull Bot before the code merge. I have since removed the Bot and am resubmitting the code once more.

Would it be possible for you to create a docker build in GitHub Action after the code merge? It would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
litellm	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Oct 20, 2023 4:27am

[krrishdholakia]

Hey @coconut49 what does

create a docker build in GitHub Action

mean?

[coconut49]

Hi @krrishdholakia Could you kindly navigate to https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/actions/workflows/docker.yml and click on the Run workflow button, please? Because I'm not a maintainer, I don't have access to trigger workflows.

[SlapDrone]

+1 here, would be great if y'all published the package @krrishdholakia! 😄

[krrishdholakia]

done @coconut49

@SlapDrone / @coconut49 any help understanding why y'all are doing this would be great, so we can actually make this better for your use-case.

attaching my calendly, even a 10 minute chat on this would help a lot - https://calendly.com/d/4mp-gd3-k5k/litellm-1-1-onboarding-chat.

[krrishdholakia]

fyi - @coconut49 @SlapDrone there was an issue with the build

[krrishdholakia]

what's the right naming scheme for docker images?

[krrishdholakia]

cc: @ishaan-jaff i think you've worked on this

[SlapDrone]

what's the right naming scheme for docker images?

@krrishdholakia lowercase (berriai) and I think typically for ghcr the tag should match the branch, so main, but I am not an expert on ghcr, so perhaps it's possible to change this behaviour.

done @coconut49

@SlapDrone / @coconut49 any help understanding why y'all are doing this would be great, so we can actually make this better for your use-case.

attaching my calendly, even a 10 minute chat on this would help a lot - https://calendly.com/d/4mp-gd3-k5k/litellm-1-1-onboarding-chat.

Sorry I am in the absolute worst time zone for this haha!

But hopefully it's simple enough: At least for me the use-case is literally just to be able to pull (an up-to-date) litellm directly from a docker repository (i.e. docker pull ghcr.io/.../litellm:main) rather than clone this repo and build the image locally. This means I can just have litellm set up for example as a service in a docker-compose file.

[krrishdholakia]

@SlapDrone thanks.

What does:

litellm set up for example as a service in a docker-compose file.
mean?

Is this our simple-proxy that you're trying to spin up? https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/tree/main/openai-proxy?

[krrishdholakia]

Hey @coconut49 @SlapDrone got an image deployed - https://github.com/orgs/BerriAI/packages/container/package/litellm

Will formalize this into a proper workflow

[coconut49]

what's the right naming scheme for docker images?

@krrishdholakia lowercase (berriai) and I think typically for ghcr the tag should match the branch, so main, but I am not an expert on ghcr, so perhaps it's possible to change this behaviour.

done @coconut49
@SlapDrone / @coconut49 any help understanding why y'all are doing this would be great, so we can actually make this better for your use-case.
attaching my calendly, even a 10 minute chat on this would help a lot - https://calendly.com/d/4mp-gd3-k5k/litellm-1-1-onboarding-chat.

Sorry I am in the absolute worst time zone for this haha!

But hopefully it's simple enough: At least for me the use-case is literally just to be able to pull (an up-to-date) litellm directly from a docker repository (i.e. docker pull ghcr.io/.../litellm:main) rather than clone this repo and build the image locally. This means I can just have litellm set up for example as a service in a docker-compose file.

Hi @krrishdholakia I have merged the #678 . Can you try to create a docker build in GitHub Action again?

[SlapDrone]

+1, will be super nice to get the CI pipeline publishing packages regularly.