Add PandasPdb.read_pdb_from_list method + unit test

[dominiquesydow]

Code of Conduct

Description

This PR suggests a class method PandasPdb.read_pdb_from_list in order to provide the same API in the mol2 and pdb modules.

pmol = PandasMol2()
pmol.read_mol2()
pmol.read_mol2_from_list()

ppdb = PandasPdb()
ppdb.read_pdb()
ppdb.read_pdb_from_list()  # New feature?

Related issues or pull requests

Proposes code for the suggested feature in #70.

Pull Request Checklist

• Added a note about the modification or contribution to the ./docs/sources/CHANGELOG.md file (if applicable)
  • Add note to if this suggestion is considered to be accepted.
  • Do you mean this files ./docs/CHANGELOG.md?
• Added appropriate unit test functions in the ./biopandas/*/tests directories (if applicable)
• Modify documentation in the corresponding Jupyter Notebook under biopandas/docs/sources/ (if applicable)
  • Modify documentation if this suggestion is considered to be accepted.
  • Do you mean the Jupyter Notebook in biopandas/docs/tutorials/ or the Markdown documentation in biopandas/docs/sources/?
• Ran PYTHONPATH='.' pytest ./biopandas -sv and make sure that all unit tests pass (for small modifications, it might be sufficient to only run the specific test file, e.g., PYTHONPATH='.' pytest ./biopandas/classifier/tests/test_stacking_cv_classifier.py -sv)
• Checked for style issues by running flake8 ./biopandas

[pep8speaks]

Hello @dominiquesydow! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2020-10-22 18:25:32 UTC

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 94.334% when pulling 50fd9c4 on dominiquesydow:add-read-pdb-from-list into 8da42c2 on rasbt:master.

[rasbt]

Thanks for the PR. Looks great! I will add the changelog entry in the other PR (#73) to avoid rebasing.