Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove duplicate error log from reporter #2252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

Intizar-T
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The issue is duplicate and fixed with #2250

Fixes #2191

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist before requesting a review

  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • If it is a core feature, I have added thorough tests.

Deployment

  • Should publish npm package
  • Should publish Docker image

@Intizar-T Intizar-T self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
@Intizar-T Intizar-T requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2024 07:40
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the regularReporterJob method in the Reporter struct of the node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go file. A logging statement that recorded errors from the GetLatestDataRest function has been removed, affecting how errors are logged and potentially impacting error visibility during execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go Removed a logging statement for error handling in regularReporterJob method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Error logging for GetLatestDataRest (2191) The removal of the logging statement omits error visibility.

🐰 In the code’s quiet night,
A logging line took flight,
Errors hidden, out of sight,
But still, the rabbit hops with delight!
Change may come, but listen here,
For every bug, we must keep near! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8782295 and 0764571.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
node/pkg/reporter/reporter.go (6)

Line range hint 17-48: LGTM!

The NewReporter function is well-implemented and initializes the Reporter instance correctly based on the configurations.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 50-69: LGTM!

The Run function correctly handles the main loop and job execution for the Reporter.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 83-95: LGTM!

The deviationJob function correctly identifies and handles deviations in the data.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 97-137: LGTM!

The report function efficiently handles data submission using concurrency and batch processing.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 139-158: LGTM!

The mergeErrors function correctly aggregates multiple errors into a single error message.

The code changes are approved.


Line range hint 71-81: Verify the impact of removing the error log.

The removal of the error logging in regularReporterJob could impact debugging and monitoring. Ensure that this change aligns with the system's logging strategy and that adequate logging is maintained elsewhere.

Verification successful

Error Logging Removal Impact Mitigated by Extensive Logging Elsewhere

The removal of the error logging in the regularReporterJob function is mitigated by the extensive use of log.Error() throughout the codebase. Ensure that the specific context of the removed log is adequately covered by other logging mechanisms.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if error handling and logging are adequately addressed elsewhere in the codebase.

# Test: Search for error handling in the reporter service. Expect: Adequate error handling and logging.
rg --type go -A 5 $'log.Error()'

Length of output: 246829

Copy link
Collaborator

@nick-bisonai nick-bisonai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Intizar-T Intizar-T merged commit e7b8270 into master Aug 28, 2024
1 check passed
@Intizar-T Intizar-T deleted the feat/remove-reporter-duplicate-error branch August 28, 2024 10:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[reporter][baobab] ReporterJob
2 participants