Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(blob-propagation-jobs-cli): fix blob iteration in date range for create command #642

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

PJColombo
Copy link
Member

@PJColombo PJColombo commented Nov 25, 2024

Checklist

  • My change requires a documentation update, and I have done it.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have filled out the description and linked the related issues.

Description

It fixes an issue where the create command failed to properly iterate over blobs within a specified date range.

Additionally, it introduces support for creating jobs based on a specified block number range.

Motivation and Context (Optional)

Related Issue (Optional)

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Use the lowest or highest block in the database to define the range for job creation when the provided range is significantly out of bounds.
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 25, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3ea9885

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
@blobscan/blob-propagation-jobs-cli Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

6 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
blobscan-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am
blobscan-gnosis ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am
blobscan-holesky ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am
blobscan-mainnet ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am
blobscan-sepolia ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am
blobscan-staging ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 27, 2024 8:42am

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 25, 2024

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for @blobscan/web

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

⚠️ Global Bundle Size Increased

Page Size (compressed)
global 332.25 KB (🔴 +86.63 KB)
Details

The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!

New Pages Added

The following pages were added to the bundle from the code in this PR:

Page Size (compressed) First Load % of Budget (350 KB)
/block_neighbor 251 B 332.5 KB 95.00%
/stats 348 KB 680.25 KB 194.36%

Eight Pages Changed Size

The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:

Page Size (compressed) First Load % of Budget (350 KB)
/ 353.03 KB 685.28 KB 195.80% (🟢 -4.66%)
/address/[address] 28.54 KB 360.79 KB 103.08% (🟢 -4.34%)
/blob/[hash] 29.21 KB 361.46 KB 103.28% (🟢 -3.78%)
/blobs 79.07 KB 411.33 KB 117.52% (🟡 +13.21%)
/block/[id] 14.9 KB 347.15 KB 99.19% (🟢 -3.99%)
/blocks 76.77 KB 409.03 KB 116.86% (🟡 +13.21%)
/tx/[hash] 17.22 KB 349.47 KB 99.85% (🟡 +1.13%)
/txs 76.28 KB 408.53 KB 116.72% (🟡 +11.20%)
Details

Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.

First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

The "Budget %" column shows what percentage of your performance budget the First Load total takes up. For example, if your budget was 100kb, and a given page's first load size was 10kb, it would be 10% of your budget. You can also see how much this has increased or decreased compared to the base branch of your PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this. If you see "+/- <0.01%" it means that there was a change in bundle size, but it is a trivial enough amount that it can be ignored.

@PJColombo PJColombo changed the title feat(blob-propagation-jobs-cli): add fix(blob-propagation-jobs-cli): fix blob iteration in date range for create command Nov 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.86022% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (609fb2e) to head (3ea9885).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...s/blob-propagation-jobs-cli/src/commands/create.ts 90.39% 17 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #642      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.61%   88.76%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         159      159              
  Lines       10664    10863     +199     
  Branches     1195     1204       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         9450     9643     +193     
- Misses       1214     1220       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@PabloCastellano PabloCastellano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another changeset should be created for the following feature:

Additionally, it introduces support for creating jobs based on a specified block number range.

@PJColombo PJColombo merged commit 6e947ba into main Nov 27, 2024
14 checks passed
@PJColombo PJColombo deleted the fix/blob-propagation-cli/create-command-fixes branch November 27, 2024 08:47
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants