Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Women aren't unintelligent #94

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

tomasaschan
Copy link

Before this change, the end of this paragraph made it seem like you think
women are unintelligent - the implied meaning was that if programming
actually was the most intellectually demanding task imaginable, then
it would be reasonable to assume women couldn't be as good as men.

I believe (hope) that this is really not what you meant; this change makes
that much more clear.

(Disclaimer: English is not my first language, so feel free to re-word this if
it feels off...)

@tomasaschan tomasaschan changed the title Women are unintelligent Women aren't unintelligent Jun 18, 2015
Before this change, the end of this paragraph made it seem like you
think women are unintelligent - the implied meaning was that *if*
programming actually *was* the most intellectually demanding task
imaginable, *then* it would be reasonable to assume women couldn't
be as good as men.
I believe (hope) that this is really not what you
meant; this change makes that much more clear.
@tomasaschan
Copy link
Author

I wanted to label this text, but I don't have access to edit labels.

After coming back to read this again, I realized this is probably fixed better
by just removing the offending sentence alltogether. I don't think any value
is lost this way, but there is now no way to read this paragraph as if it means
that the author claims women are stupid.
@tomasaschan
Copy link
Author

This has been fixed elsewhere.

@tomasaschan tomasaschan closed this Dec 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants