Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] BUG: Sets Face Label for virtual boundary to -1 in SurfaceNetsFilter #1158

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

imikejackson
Copy link
Contributor

  • This makes the value consistent with QuickMesh
  • Added documentation on the pros, cons and Face Labels for this filter.

@imikejackson imikejackson force-pushed the topic/surface_nets_virtual_boundary_value branch from c39efd1 to c33ee50 Compare December 7, 2024 04:15
- This makes the value consistent with QuickMesh
- Added documentation on the pros, cons and Face Labels for this filter.

Signed-off-by: Michael Jackson <mike.jackson@bluequartz.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Jackson <mike.jackson@bluequartz.net>
This does not work.
The feature needs to be redesigned.

Signed-off-by: Michael Jackson <mike.jackson@bluequartz.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Jackson <mike.jackson@bluequartz.net>
@imikejackson imikejackson force-pushed the topic/surface_nets_virtual_boundary_value branch from 10420df to 156ad24 Compare December 10, 2024 15:21
…COMMIT IS JUNK

The issue is that the outer virtual boundary Face Labels and the underlying FeatureIds
do not agree. I think we may need to store the actual index offset into the
FeatureIds array and then also store a reference to the FeatureIds array so that
we can get the data consistently.

Signed-off-by: Michael Jackson <mike.jackson@bluequartz.net>
@imikejackson imikejackson marked this pull request as draft December 12, 2024 21:27
@imikejackson imikejackson changed the title BUG: Sets Face Label for virtual boundary to -1 in SurfaceNetsFilter [WIP] BUG: Sets Face Label for virtual boundary to -1 in SurfaceNetsFilter Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants