feat(MeiliSearch): add MeiliSearch component #133
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR adds a new MeiliSearch component to the BootstrapBlazor library, implementing client-side search functionality using the MeiliSearch search engine. The implementation includes the core component, JavaScript interop, styling, and configuration options. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.
Blocking issues:
- Search input should be sanitized before making API calls (link)
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding XML documentation comments for the public APIs to improve IntelliSense experience
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🔴 Security: 1 blocking issue
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| resetStatus(search); | ||
|
|
||
| new bootstrap.ScrollSpy(search.list, { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): The ScrollSpy instance should be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks
Store the ScrollSpy instance in the search object and call dispose() on it in the dispose() method
| resetStatus(search); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| const fn = debounce(doSearch); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: The debounce delay should be configurable to handle different use cases
Consider adding a debounceDelay option to the component's configuration
| const fn = debounce(doSearch); | |
| const defaultDelay = 300; | |
| const debounceDelay = options?.debounceDelay ?? defaultDelay; | |
| const fn = debounce(doSearch, debounceDelay); |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const doSearch = async (search, query) => { | ||
| if (query) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 issue (security): Search input should be sanitized before making API calls
Add input validation and sanitization to prevent potential XSS or injection attacks
| const doSearch = async (search, query) => { | ||
| if (query) { | ||
| search.status.innerHTML = search.searchText; | ||
| const client = new MeiliSearch({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: Error handling could be more comprehensive for API client initialization
Add specific error handling for network issues, invalid credentials, and other potential API client initialization failures
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const updateList = (search, result) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (complexity): Consider using template literals for HTML generation instead of manual DOM manipulation
The updateList function's manual DOM manipulation adds unnecessary complexity. Consider simplifying using template literals while maintaining the same functionality:
const updateList = (search, result) => {
const { menu, list, input, template, blockTemplate } = search;
const menuHtml = result.hits.map(hit => `
<a class="search-dialog-menu-item" href="#hit${hit.id}">${hit.menu}</a>
`).join('');
const listHtml = result.hits.map(hit => {
if (hit.title === '') return '';
const demosHtml = hit.demos ? `
<ol class="mb-0 mt-2">
${hit.demos.map(block => `
<li>
<a href="${block.url || hit.url}">
<h5>${highlight(block.title, result.query)}</h5>
<p>${highlight(block.intro, result.query)}</p>
</a>
</li>
`).join('')}
</ol>
` : '';
return `
<div id="hit${hit.id}" class="search-dialog-item">
<a href="${hit.url}">
<h4>${highlight(hit.title, result.query)}</h4>
<p>${highlight(hit.subTitle, result.query)}</p>
<span>${hit.demos.length}</span>
</a>
${demosHtml}
</div>
`;
}).join('');
menu.innerHTML = menuHtml;
menu.classList.add('show');
list.innerHTML = listHtml;
input.focus();
bootstrap.ScrollSpy.getInstance(list).refresh();
};This approach:
- Eliminates manual DOM element creation
- Reduces nesting and improves readability
- Maintains all existing functionality
- Uses a single innerHTML operation per container
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| function _callSuper(t, o, e) { | ||
| return o = _getPrototypeOf(o), _possibleConstructorReturn(t, _isNativeReflectConstruct() ? Reflect.construct(o, e || [], _getPrototypeOf(t).constructor) : o.apply(t, e)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Don't reassign parameter - o (dont-reassign-parameters)
Explanation
Reassigning parameters can lead to unexpected behavior, especially when accessing the arguments object. It can also cause optimization issues, especially in V8.From the Airbnb JavaScript Style Guide
| function _classCallCheck(a, n) { | ||
| if (!(a instanceof n)) throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Avoid function declarations, favouring function assignment expressions, inside blocks. (avoid-function-declarations-in-blocks)
Explanation
Function declarations may be hoisted in Javascript, but the behaviour is inconsistent between browsers. Hoisting is generally confusing and should be avoided. Rather than using function declarations inside blocks, you should use function expressions, which create functions in-scope.| return o = _getPrototypeOf(o), _possibleConstructorReturn(t, _isNativeReflectConstruct() ? Reflect.construct(o, e || [], _getPrototypeOf(t).constructor) : o.apply(t, e)); | ||
| } | ||
| function _classCallCheck(a, n) { | ||
| if (!(a instanceof n)) throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)
| if (!(a instanceof n)) throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); | |
| if (!(a instanceof n)) { |
Explanation
It is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).
| function _construct(t, e, r) { | ||
| if (_isNativeReflectConstruct()) return Reflect.construct.apply(null, arguments); | ||
| var o = [null]; | ||
| o.push.apply(o, e); | ||
| var p = new (t.bind.apply(t, o))(); | ||
| return r && _setPrototypeOf(p, r.prototype), p; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (code-quality): Avoid function declarations, favouring function assignment expressions, inside blocks. (avoid-function-declarations-in-blocks)
Explanation
Function declarations may be hoisted in Javascript, but the behaviour is inconsistent between browsers. Hoisting is generally confusing and should be avoided. Rather than using function declarations inside blocks, you should use function expressions, which create functions in-scope.| if (!(a instanceof n)) throw new TypeError("Cannot call a class as a function"); | ||
| } | ||
| function _construct(t, e, r) { | ||
| if (_isNativeReflectConstruct()) return Reflect.construct.apply(null, arguments); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)
| if (_isNativeReflectConstruct()) return Reflect.construct.apply(null, arguments); | |
| if (_isNativeReflectConstruct()) { |
Explanation
It is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).
add MeiliSearch component
Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)
Description
fixes #132
Customer Impact
Regression?
[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]
Risk
[Justify the selection above]
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?
☑️ Self Check before Merge
Summary by Sourcery
New Features: