-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(MeiliSearch): use HeadContent render static assets #177
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR refactors the MeiliSearch component to use HeadContent for loading static assets (CSS and JavaScript) instead of dynamically loading them via JavaScript. This change simplifies the asset loading process and follows better practices for resource management in Blazor applications. Sequence diagram for static asset loading in MeiliSearchBoxsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant MeiliSearchBox
participant HeadContent
User->>Browser: Load MeiliSearchBox
Browser->>MeiliSearchBox: Render component
MeiliSearchBox->>HeadContent: Load static assets
HeadContent-->>Browser: CSS and JS loaded
Browser-->>User: Display search box with assets
Class diagram for MeiliSearchBox component refactorclassDiagram
class MeiliSearchBox {
+string Id
+string ClassString
+string SearchBoxPlaceHolder
+Dictionary AdditionalAttributes
}
note for MeiliSearchBox "Refactored to use HeadContent for static assets"
class HeadContent {
+link href
+script src
}
MeiliSearchBox --> HeadContent : uses
File-Level Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please complete the PR template, particularly the risk assessment and verification sections, to help reviewers understand the impact and testing done.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
use HeadContent render static assets
Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)
Description
fixes #178
Customer Impact
Regression?
[If yes, specify the version the behavior has regressed from]
Risk
[Justify the selection above]
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?
☑️ Self Check before Merge
Summary by Sourcery
Enhancements: