-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to create larger supply boxes with smaller resupply boxes inside them #540
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small fixes for consistency
The requires an ACE version after 2024/08/27 or the ability to pickup and move the larger box of boxes won't propagate across the network. |
we usually pull master iirc so if it’s in that we are g2g |
Figured, just didn't want this to get merged and pushed if Potato was updated but not ACE BW |
good clarification for my sake because pabst usually does the ACE BW updates and I do POTATO, good to know so we can sync up |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
markers need to be side-specific to the unit marking. blufor and opfor marking the same crate should make it visible to blufor and opfor, but their state is not synchronized to each other
edit: this may be the case, i’m just posting this for PR history
It sure is the case, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually g2g this approval now lol
This adds an idea kilo had/stole in the resupply boxes suggestion on BW's discord. It allows a mission maker to use the
CfgLoadouts
SupplyBoxes
class to make larger boxes with multiple smaller resupply boxes inside them. See this exampleTODO