Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix GC hole on arm32
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
On arm32 only, in cases where we have STOREIND(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR) of
a GC var, the JIT was generating (e.g.):
```
add     r1, sp, 48   // [V27 tmp23]
str     r0, [r1]
```
If this was a local variable birth, codegen would correctly process the lifetime. However,
we would have created an instrDesc that knows nothing about the local var, so can't emit
any GC transitions during emission.

It turns out this is also sub-optimal code; we don't need to create a byref of the
address of a local when we can encode the address directly in an addressing mode, as:
```
str     r0, [sp+48]   // [V27 tmp23]
```

There was already code on arm64 to handle this case, by making the LCL_VAR_ADDR contained
and using the emitIns_S_R / emitIns_R_S functions, which create instrDescs with the necessary
local tracking info.

I added an assert, on both arm32 and arm64, that non-contained local var address nodes must
refer to untracked locals. Otherwise, we could potentially create addresses where we don't
properly track the GC info.

There are quite a few diffs, avoiding creating the local var address. There are several cases
I noted in the Microsoft.CodeAnalysis assemblies of bad GC info now fixed (this is where the
initial failure came from, that the Runtime_45557 test was derived from).

From libraries crossgen:

```

Summary of Code Size diffs:
(Lower is better)

Total bytes of base: 255542
Total bytes of diff: 251924
Total bytes of delta: -3618 (-1.42% of base)
    diff is an improvement.
```
<details>

<summary>Detail diffs</summary>

```

Top file improvements (bytes):
         -18 : 133274.dasm (-0.95% of base)
         -16 : 136993.dasm (-1.44% of base)
         -14 : 127453.dasm (-1.35% of base)
         -12 : 126915.dasm (-1.15% of base)
         -12 : 63852.dasm (-1.71% of base)
         -12 : 137357.dasm (-3.59% of base)
         -12 : 7927.dasm (-2.29% of base)
         -12 : 39850.dasm (-1.11% of base)
         -10 : 132884.dasm (-2.11% of base)
         -10 : 10262.dasm (-0.95% of base)
         -10 : 131112.dasm (-7.35% of base)
         -10 : 74924.dasm (-4.50% of base)
          -8 : 10344.dasm (-5.48% of base)
          -8 : 10435.dasm (-6.67% of base)
          -8 : 56301.dasm (-1.08% of base)
          -8 : 56683.dasm (-0.31% of base)
          -8 : 56686.dasm (-0.49% of base)
          -8 : 10341.dasm (-5.48% of base)
          -8 : 10346.dasm (-5.06% of base)
          -8 : 126900.dasm (-0.43% of base)

1107 total files with Code Size differences (1107 improved, 0 regressed), 0 unchanged.

Top method improvements (bytes):
         -18 (-0.95% of base) : 133274.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Binder:CreateUserDefinedConversion(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxNode,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.BoundExpression,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Conversion,bool,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols.TypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.DiagnosticBag):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.BoundExpression:this
         -16 (-1.44% of base) : 136993.dasm - Enumerator:MoveNext():bool:this
         -14 (-1.35% of base) : 127453.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.OverloadResolution:IsApplicable(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbol,EffectiveParameters,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.AnalyzedArguments,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],bool,bool,bool,byref):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult:this
         -12 (-1.15% of base) : 126915.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.OverloadResolution:IsMemberApplicableInExpandedForm(System.__Canon,System.__Canon,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ArrayBuilder`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols.TypeSymbol, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.AnalyzedArguments,bool,byref):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberResolutionResult`1[__Canon]:this
         -12 (-1.71% of base) : 63852.dasm - System.Security.Cryptography.RSAKeyFormatHelper:FromPkcs1PrivateKey(System.ReadOnlyMemory`1[Byte],byref,byref)
         -12 (-3.59% of base) : 137357.dasm - System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.ControlFlowBuilder:AddExceptionRegion(ushort,System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.LabelHandle,System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.LabelHandle,System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.LabelHandle,System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.LabelHandle,System.Reflection.Metadata.Ecma335.LabelHandle,System.Reflection.Metadata.EntityHandle):this
         -12 (-2.29% of base) : 7927.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Emit.AddedOrChangedMethodInfo:MapTypes(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Emit.SymbolMatcher):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Emit.AddedOrChangedMethodInfo:this
         -12 (-1.11% of base) : 39850.dasm - Internal.Cryptography.Pal.OpenSslX509CertificateReader:CopyWithPrivateKey(System.Security.Cryptography.RSA):Internal.Cryptography.ICertificatePal:this
         -10 (-2.11% of base) : 132884.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.OverloadResolution:IsConstructorApplicableInExpandedForm(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols.MethodSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.AnalyzedArguments,byref):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult:this
         -10 (-0.95% of base) : 10262.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Emit.DeltaMetadataWriter:SerializeLocalVariablesSignature(Microsoft.Cci.IMethodBody):int:this
         -10 (-7.35% of base) : 131112.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult:BadArgumentConversions(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Conversion]):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult
         -10 (-4.50% of base) : 74924.dasm - System.MemoryExtensions:AsMemory(System.__Canon[],System.Range):System.Memory`1[__Canon]
          -8 (-5.48% of base) : 10344.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerSyntaxDiagnosticsCoreAsync(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxTree,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -8 (-6.67% of base) : 10435.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalysisState:OnCompilationEventsGeneratedAsync(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationEvent, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerDriver,System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -8 (-1.08% of base) : 56301.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.MethodSignatureComparer:HaveSameParameterTypes(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.ParameterSymbol, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.TypeSubstitution,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.ParameterSymbol, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.TypeSubstitution,bool,bool):bool
          -8 (-0.31% of base) : 56683.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.ConstraintsHelper:ReportIndirectConstraintConflicts(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.SourceTypeParameterSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.ArrayBuilder`1[TypeParameterDiagnosticInfo],byref)
          -8 (-0.49% of base) : 56686.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.MethodSignatureComparer:DetailedParameterCompare(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.ParameterSymbol, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],byref,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic.Symbols.ParameterSymbol, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],byref,int,int):int
          -8 (-5.48% of base) : 10341.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerCompilationDiagnosticsCoreAsync(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -8 (-5.06% of base) : 10346.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerSemanticDiagnosticsCoreAsync(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SemanticModel,System.Nullable`1[TextSpan],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -8 (-0.43% of base) : 126900.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.OverloadResolutionResult`1[__Canon][System.__Canon]:ReportDiagnostics(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Binder,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Location,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.DiagnosticBag,System.String,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.BoundExpression,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.AnalyzedArguments,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[__Canon],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols.NamedTypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols.NamedTypeSymbol,Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CSharpSyntaxNode,bool):this

Top method improvements (percentages):
          -6 (-13.64% of base) : 135707.dasm - System.Reflection.Metadata.BlobBuilder:WriteBytes(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Byte],int,int):this
          -4 (-13.33% of base) : 17244.dasm - System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[__Canon][System.__Canon]:op_Equality(System.Nullable`1[ImmutableArray`1],System.Nullable`1[ImmutableArray`1]):bool
          -4 (-13.33% of base) : 17245.dasm - System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[__Canon][System.__Canon]:op_Inequality(System.Nullable`1[ImmutableArray`1],System.Nullable`1[ImmutableArray`1]):bool
          -2 (-10.00% of base) : 138130.dasm - System.Reflection.Internal.ImmutableByteArrayInterop:DangerousGetUnderlyingArray(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Byte]):System.Byte[]
          -4 (-8.33% of base) : 75404.dasm - System.Range:Equals(System.Range):bool:this
         -10 (-7.35% of base) : 131112.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult:BadArgumentConversions(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Conversion]):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult
          -8 (-6.67% of base) : 10435.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalysisState:OnCompilationEventsGeneratedAsync(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationEvent, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.AnalyzerDriver,System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -8 (-5.80% of base) : 130961.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult:NormalForm(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Int32],System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[Conversion],bool):Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.MemberAnalysisResult
          -8 (-5.56% of base) : 10340.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerCompilationDiagnosticsAsync(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -8 (-5.48% of base) : 10344.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerSyntaxDiagnosticsCoreAsync(Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.SyntaxTree,System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -8 (-5.48% of base) : 10341.dasm - Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.CompilationWithAnalyzers:GetAnalyzerCompilationDiagnosticsCoreAsync(System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostics.DiagnosticAnalyzer, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]],System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[[System.Collections.Immutable.ImmutableArray`1[[Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Diagnostic, Microsoft.CodeAnalysis, Version=1.1.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35]], System.Collections.Immutable, Version=6.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a]]:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 166017.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.Bson.BsonDataReader:DoReadAsDecimalAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[Nullable`1]:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 166019.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.Bson.BsonDataReader:DoReadAsDoubleAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[Nullable`1]:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 166021.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.Bson.BsonDataReader:DoReadAsInt32Async(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[Nullable`1]:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 166024.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.Bson.BsonDataReader:ReaderReadAndAssertAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 166067.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.Bson.BsonDataWriter:CompleteAndCloseOutputAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 93077.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.JsonTextReader:ParseConstructorAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 93084.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.JsonTextReader:ReadNumberIntoBufferAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 93085.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.JsonTextReader:ParseUnquotedPropertyAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task:this
          -6 (-5.45% of base) : 93086.dasm - Newtonsoft.Json.JsonTextReader:ReadNullCharAsync(System.Threading.CancellationToken):System.Threading.Tasks.Task`1[Boolean]:this

1107 total methods with Code Size differences (1107 improved, 0 regressed), 0 unchanged.

```

</details>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixes dotnet#46023
  • Loading branch information
BruceForstall committed Apr 7, 2021
1 parent b3d4eb2 commit efb19b0
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 51 additions and 5 deletions.
32 changes: 30 additions & 2 deletions src/coreclr/jit/emitarm.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7742,7 +7742,7 @@ void emitter::emitInsLoadStoreOp(instruction ins, emitAttr attr, regNumber dataR

if (addr->isContained())
{
assert(addr->OperGet() == GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR || addr->OperGet() == GT_LEA);
assert(addr->OperIs(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR, GT_LEA));

DWORD lsl = 0;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -7827,7 +7827,21 @@ void emitter::emitInsLoadStoreOp(instruction ins, emitAttr attr, regNumber dataR
}
else // no Index
{
if (emitIns_valid_imm_for_ldst_offset(offset, attr))
if (addr->OperIs(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR))
{
GenTreeLclVarCommon* varNode = addr->AsLclVarCommon();
unsigned lclNum = varNode->GetLclNum();
unsigned offset = varNode->GetLclOffs();
if (emitInsIsStore(ins))
{
emitIns_S_R(ins, attr, dataReg, lclNum, offset);
}
else
{
emitIns_R_S(ins, attr, dataReg, lclNum, offset);
}
}
else if (emitIns_valid_imm_for_ldst_offset(offset, attr))
{
// Then load/store dataReg from/to [memBase + offset]
emitIns_R_R_I(ins, attr, dataReg, memBase->GetRegNum(), offset);
Expand All @@ -7847,6 +7861,20 @@ void emitter::emitInsLoadStoreOp(instruction ins, emitAttr attr, regNumber dataR
}
else
{
#ifdef DEBUG
if (addr->OperIs(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR))
{
// If the local var is a gcref or byref, the local var better be untracked, because we have
// no logic here to track local variable lifetime changes, like we do in the contained case
// above. E.g., for a `str r0,[r1]` for byref `r1` to local `V01`, we won't store the local
// `V01` and so the emitter can't update the GC lifetime for `V01` if this is a variable birth.
GenTreeLclVarCommon* varNode = addr->AsLclVarCommon();
unsigned lclNum = varNode->GetLclNum();
LclVarDsc* varDsc = emitComp->lvaGetDesc(lclNum);
assert(!varDsc->lvTracked);
}
#endif // DEBUG

if (offset != 0)
{
assert(emitIns_valid_imm_for_add(offset, INS_FLAGS_DONT_CARE));
Expand Down
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions src/coreclr/jit/emitarm64.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13510,6 +13510,20 @@ void emitter::emitInsLoadStoreOp(instruction ins, emitAttr attr, regNumber dataR
}
else // addr is not contained, so we evaluate it into a register
{
#ifdef DEBUG
if (addr->OperIs(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR))
{
// If the local var is a gcref or byref, the local var better be untracked, because we have
// no logic here to track local variable lifetime changes, like we do in the contained case
// above. E.g., for a `str r0,[r1]` for byref `r1` to local `V01`, we won't store the local
// `V01` and so the emitter can't update the GC lifetime for `V01` if this is a variable birth.
GenTreeLclVarCommon* varNode = addr->AsLclVarCommon();
unsigned lclNum = varNode->GetLclNum();
LclVarDsc* varDsc = emitComp->lvaGetDesc(lclNum);
assert(!varDsc->lvTracked);
}
#endif // DEBUG

// Then load/store dataReg from/to [addrReg]
emitIns_R_R(ins, attr, dataReg, addr->GetRegNum());
}
Expand Down
10 changes: 7 additions & 3 deletions src/coreclr/jit/lowerarmarch.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1453,13 +1453,17 @@ void Lowering::ContainCheckIndir(GenTreeIndir* indirNode)
MakeSrcContained(indirNode, addr);
}
}
else if (addr->OperIs(GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR))
{
// These nodes go into an addr mode:
// - GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR is a stack addr mode.
MakeSrcContained(indirNode, addr);
}
#ifdef TARGET_ARM64
else if (addr->OperIs(GT_CLS_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR))
else if (addr->OperIs(GT_CLS_VAR_ADDR))
{
// These nodes go into an addr mode:
// - GT_CLS_VAR_ADDR turns into a constant.
// - GT_LCL_VAR_ADDR, GT_LCL_FLD_ADDR is a stack addr mode.

// make this contained, it turns into a constant that goes into an addr mode
MakeSrcContained(indirNode, addr);
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit efb19b0

Please sign in to comment.