fixes issues with lineage graph filtering with client side filtering

[fcollman]

This is necessary on v1 at least where timestamp filtering does not appear to give the result one would want.

root_ts = client.chunkedgraph.get_root_timestamps(root_id)[0]
mat_timestamp=client.materialize.get_version_metadata(version=630)['time_stamp']
lineage_graph= client.chunkedgraph.get_lineage_graph(root_id, timestamp_past=root_ts,
                                                     timestamp_future=mat_timestamp)
print(f'root_ts: {root_ts} mat_timestamp: {mat_timestamp}')
for node in lineage_graph['nodes']:
    node_ts= datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(node['timestamp'])
    node_ts=node_ts.astimezone(datetime.timezone.utc)
    if ( (node_ts<mat_timestamp) or (node_ts>root_ts)):
        print(node, node_ts)

[arie-matsliah]

LGTM

[arie-matsliah]

Nit:
if isinstance(root_id, (int, np.uint64, np.int64))

[fcollman]

fixed

[arie-matsliah]

can these be timestamps or None? then we could use 2 args instead of 4

[fcollman]

no this is slightly different, it depends on whether you want to include links that cross over the boundary or not. For different use cases you might want those or not. For example, when going backward in time, you might want to know the first root_id that comes before the timestamp_past, because that is the root_id that would be current at timestamp_past.