Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated Turbine configuration: FOQUS considers Aspen simulation successful even if there is error in Aspen #258

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fsoepyan
Copy link
Contributor

I updated turbineConfiguration.py, such that FOQUS will consider an Aspen Plus simulation to be successful, even though the Aspen Plus simulation reports to the user that the simulation completed with warnings and/or errors.

…n successful even if there is error in Aspen

I updated turbineConfiguration.py, such that FOQUS will consider an Aspen Plus simulation to be successful, even though the Aspen Plus simulation reports to the user that the simulation completed with warnings and/or errors.
@fsoepyan fsoepyan added enhancement Improve existing, and add new capabilites to FOQUS Flowsheet Issues related to setting up, & running process models for simulation in the Flowsheet tab labels Aug 10, 2018
@fsoepyan fsoepyan requested a review from eslickj August 10, 2018 20:04
@eslickj
Copy link
Member

eslickj commented Aug 17, 2018

I don't think we want to do this. If the simulation ends in an error you want to know, and don't want FOQUS to say it was successful. At least this should be optional. This also doesn't fix the issue of results not being returned for outputs when there is an error, and warnings being mistaken for errors.

Let's hold off on this until we track down the main source of the problem.

@fsoepyan fsoepyan changed the title Updated Turbine configuration: FOQUS considers Aspen simulation successful even if there is error is Aspen Updated Turbine configuration: FOQUS considers Aspen simulation successful even if there is error in Aspen Aug 20, 2018
@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

@eslickj says this should be addressed via #268, not this way.

@fsoepyan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ksbeattie
Copy link
Member

Closing this as it was fixed by updating TurbineLite (https://github.com/CCSI-Toolset/turb_sci_gate/releases/tag/2.0.1). See issue #268

@ksbeattie ksbeattie closed this Sep 4, 2018
@fsoepyan fsoepyan deleted the fsoepyan-patch-5 branch September 11, 2018 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve existing, and add new capabilites to FOQUS Flowsheet Issues related to setting up, & running process models for simulation in the Flowsheet tab
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants