Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 #1676

Closed
wants to merge 19 commits into from

Conversation

durack1
Copy link
Member

@durack1 durack1 commented Nov 11, 2015

Test update for netcdf-c 4.4.0-rc4

@aashish24 @doutriaux1 this is a placeholder - please do not merge until the final 4.4.0 release is out and this PR is updated

@durack1 durack1 added this to the 3.0 milestone Nov 13, 2015
@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@durack1 let's do it post 2.4

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Nov 16, 2015

@aashish24 @doutriaux1 yep it's still in RC so 2.4+ is certainly where it should be merged..

@durack1 durack1 changed the title issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 [WIP] issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 Dec 20, 2015
@durack1 durack1 modified the milestones: 2.6, 3.0 Jan 4, 2016
@durack1 durack1 force-pushed the issue1579_durack1_UpdateNetcdf4.3.3.1To4.4.0 branch from 3750173 to fbd1d9a Compare January 15, 2016 01:02
@durack1 durack1 changed the title [WIP] issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 Jan 15, 2016
@durack1 durack1 changed the title issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 [WIP] issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 Jan 15, 2016
@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Jan 15, 2016

This also needs a bump to the hdf libraries - so will update the sources and add that in

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Jan 15, 2016

@doutriaux1 looks like the macbots are in trouble again..

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Jan 15, 2016

@doutriaux1 I'd be inclined to update zlib from the confusing arrangement where there are 4 versions being built depending on the system, or using the system zlib, to a forced build of 1.2.8 the latest release

@durack1 durack1 force-pushed the issue1579_durack1_UpdateNetcdf4.3.3.1To4.4.0 branch from 9351361 to 64bae4c Compare January 16, 2016 21:43
@durack1 durack1 changed the title [WIP] issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 issue1579 durack1 update netcdf 4.3.3.1 to 4.4.0 Jan 28, 2016
@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 it would be great to get this PR merged.. Can you folks take a look at it tomorrow

Yes, I will look into it tomorrow @durack1

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Feb 21, 2016

@aashish24 @doutriaux1 ping!

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 2, 2016

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 can this please be reviewed pronto? It's been sitting in the queue for too long now

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 3, 2016

@doutriaux1 what's going on with the bots none of them are working any more

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 3, 2016

@dnadeau4 please test this PR and merge if it's all ok.
I'm uncertain why @aashish24 and @doutriaux1 have not reviewed and merged this already.

@dnadeau4
Copy link
Contributor

dnadeau4 commented Mar 3, 2016

All cdms2 test passed with netCDF 4.4.0 Somehow I cannot click "Merge Pull Request". @doutriaux1 did you change something in the "github" configuration?

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor

@durack1 pronto? Really? Are you our project manager now? We got many many fires going on right now and the last thing we need to need is add oil on the fire by merging something that has not been carefully reviewed. I apologize we could not get to this pronto. We'll try to work longer hours in the future...

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 3, 2016

@doutriaux1 if you can add it to the review queue that would be great. @dnadeau4 has also taken a look and tested in his env

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 3, 2016

@doutraux1 the garant failure is due to a missing baseline https://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=425699817&build=4261331 - nothing to do with the PR

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 15, 2016

@doutriaux1 @aashish24 @dnadeau4 is there a reason that this is being held up? It seems like it's good to go..?

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor

yes there is, I do not have time to properly get to it, everytime I build it, something comes up and I forget and then I need to build it again the next time, etc...

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 15, 2016

@doutriaux1 ok great good to know.. I was wondering if there was something with the PR that needed attention.. If it's just time then good to know it's still in the queue..

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@durack1 @doutriaux1 if CI is happy, lets get this merged in.

@durack1
Copy link
Member Author

durack1 commented Mar 23, 2016

@aashish24 I'll defer to @doutriaux1 for this

@doutriaux1
Copy link
Contributor

@aashish24 I'm neither happy or not with it. I really need to look at it carefully first, sorry @durack1 I know you want it bad. Maybe Thursday I can take a close look at it.

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe Thursday I can take a close look at it.

thanks @doutriaux1

@aashish24
Copy link
Contributor

@durack1 talked to @doutriaux1 we will look into it past 2.4.1.

@aashish24 aashish24 closed this Mar 25, 2016
@durack1 durack1 mentioned this pull request Jun 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants