Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dEdd implementation #760

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2022
Merged

Update dEdd implementation #760

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 29, 2022

Conversation

apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

@apcraig apcraig commented Sep 20, 2022

PR checklist

  • Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
    Update dEdd implementation with fixes

  • Developer(s):
    apcraig, eclare108213

  • Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.

  • Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
    bit-for-bit on cheyenne full test suite except alt04, https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/cice_by_hash_forks#007fbff9b1012b4fb1e447141a888d18b6c24d19

  • How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?

    • bit for bit, except alt04 (expected)
    • different at roundoff level
    • more substantial
  • Does this PR create or have dependencies on Icepack or any other models?

    • Yes, but only because we want to update Icepack because it has several fixes
    • No
  • Does this PR update the Icepack submodule? If so, the Icepack submodule must point to a hash on Icepack's main branch.

    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR add any new test cases?

    • Yes
    • No
  • Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/. A test build of the technical docs will be performed as part of the PR testing.)

    • Yes
    • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
      • Yes
      • No
  • Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

  • Update Icepack with several fixes (changes answers for tr_aero)

  • Update bgc aerosol table to higher precision

  • Add modal aerosol tests

  • Update test suites

- Update Icepack with several fixes (changes answers for tr_aero)
- Update bgc aerosol table to higher precision
- Add modal aerosol tests
- Update test suites
@apcraig apcraig marked this pull request as draft September 20, 2022 04:29
@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor Author

apcraig commented Sep 20, 2022

This is a draft PR, it is waiting for CICE-Consortium/Icepack#400 then I'll update the Icepack revision in this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@eclare108213 eclare108213 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine to me. @njeffery could you check whether the namelist parameter set in the modified bgcz(m) test (the set_nml.bgczm file) makes sense? And does the set_nml.modal test make sense, or do more things need to be turned on/set?

@apcraig apcraig marked this pull request as ready for review September 28, 2022 22:58
@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor Author

apcraig commented Sep 28, 2022

I'm retesting now with the updated Icepack, but confirmed that the new version and the version I was testing are identical. I don't expect any problems. This is ready for review and merge.

@apcraig
Copy link
Contributor Author

apcraig commented Sep 29, 2022

Full test suite passes, we should review and merge this.

@apcraig apcraig merged commit 6399af7 into CICE-Consortium:main Sep 29, 2022
dabail10 pushed a commit to ESCOMP/CICE that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2022
* Update dEdd implementation

- Update Icepack with several fixes (changes answers for tr_aero)
- Update bgc aerosol table to higher precision
- Add modal aerosol tests
- Update test suites

* Update Icepack including dEdd fixes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants