Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed "Choosing an appropriate time step" to match ice_dyn_shared.F90 #83

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions doc/source/cice_3_user_guide.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -774,17 +774,17 @@ default in this distribution, this is not a stringent limitation:
:math:`\Delta t < 19.4` hr, assuming :math:`\max(f) = 40` cm/day.

In the classic EVP or EAP approach (`kdyn` = 1 or 2, `revised\_evp` = false),
the dynamics component is subcycled ndte (:math:`N`) times per dynamics
the dynamics component is subcycled ndte (:math:`N`) times per thermodynamic
time step so that the elastic waves essentially disappear before the
next time step. The subcycling time step (:math:`\Delta
t_e`) is thus

.. math::
dte = dt\_dyn/ndte.
dte = dt/ndte.

A second parameter, :math:`E_\circ` (`eyc`), defines the elastic wave
damping timescale :math:`T`, described in Section :ref:`dynam`, as
`eyc`\ * `dt\_dyn`. The forcing terms are not updated during the subcycling.
`eyc`\ * `dt`. The forcing terms are not updated during the subcycling.
Given the small step (`dte`) at which the EVP dynamics model is subcycled,
the elastic parameter :math:`E` is also limited by stability
constraints, as discussed in :cite:`HD97`. Linear stability
Expand Down