-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
QPPC-6017: Docker Source cleanup, Update measures, mvp data #763
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mathematica's new file (v7.0_1.29.24.csv) contains the additionalProcedure code we need for C2Q
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The single source json file created from the new CSV adds the additionalProcedureCode. There are additional differences in the order of elements in the peformanceOptions array but this does not impact (will confirm) C2Q results
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah it appears that way. We (claims) are the only ones that care about this file. The ordering causing more diffs in these might cause some pause, but otherwise I think mostly claims items were touched overall and looking good.
measures/2023/measures-data.json
mvp/2023/mvp-enriched.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updates from the single source json file, similar additions/modifications here that occurred in that file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very nice. The claims items were due for an overhaul. Order of codes being mangled around in some of the shared jsons, is probably pretty typical.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NB but thought of something, if we're not ready to remove, should we put a note in the old claims related items, that they're just for historical purposes? The old README for creating the single source, the py script for the same, and the few odds and ends. Auxilary scripts like clean_csv.py
might not be such a big deal, but wouldn't want someone to catch the old README and make single source with old stuff.
Also, will help see if we can get the other eyes we'll need on this from outside claims.
Quality Gate passedThe SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced. 6 New issues |
Related Tickets & Documents
https://jira.cms.gov/browse/QPPC-6017
https://jira.cms.gov/browse/QPPC-6018
Description
Simplify the Docker image for creating the single source json file from Mathematica's single source CSV.
Update measures data
What type of PR is this?
Added tests?
Added to documentation?
[ ⌥ Optional ] Are there any post-deployment tasks we need to perform?