Add Java implementation of COBOL merge sort with file-based operations #25
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add Java implementation of COBOL merge sort with file-based operations
Summary
This PR adds a Java implementation that replicates the functionality of the existing COBOL merge sort program (
merge_sort_test.cbl). The Java version maintains the same three-phase approach: data creation, merge operations, and sort operations, all using file-based I/O rather than in-memory processing.Key Components Added:
CustomerRecord.java: Data model matching COBOL record structure with fixed-width formattingMergeSortExample.java: Main program implementing the three-phase workflowFunctionality Replicated:
Review & Testing Checklist for Human
./merge_sort_test) and Java (java MergeSortExample) programs side-by-side and verify console outputs are identical character-for-charactertest-file-1.txt,test-file-2.txt,merge-output.txt,sorted-contract-id.txt) between COBOL and Java versions usingdiffMergeSortExample.javamatch exactly with the data creation logic in the COBOL source (lines 185-333)toFixedWidthString()andtoDisplayString()methods to ensure field widths (5-digit IDs, 50-char names, 25-char comments) match COBOL specificationsRecommended Test Plan:
rm *.txt./merge_sort_test > cobol_output.txtrm *.txtjava MergeSortExample > java_output.txtdiff cobol_output.txt java_output.txtdiff <COBOL_generated_files> <Java_generated_files>Diagram
%%{ init : { "theme" : "default" }}%% graph TD COBOL["merge_sort_test.cbl<br/>Original COBOL Implementation"]:::context CustomerRecord["CustomerRecord.java<br/>Data Model Class"]:::major-edit MergeSortExample["MergeSortExample.java<br/>Main Program Logic"]:::major-edit TestFile1["test-file-1.txt<br/>6 Customer Records"]:::context TestFile2["test-file-2.txt<br/>5 Customer Records"]:::context MergedFile["merge-output.txt<br/>11 Records Sorted by Customer ID"]:::context SortedFile["sorted-contract-id.txt<br/>11 Records Sorted by Contract ID"]:::context COBOL -.->|"Replicates functionality"| MergeSortExample MergeSortExample -->|"Creates test data"| TestFile1 MergeSortExample -->|"Creates test data"| TestFile2 MergeSortExample -->|"Reads & merges"| MergedFile MergeSortExample -->|"Reads & sorts"| SortedFile CustomerRecord -->|"Used by"| MergeSortExample subgraph Legend L1[Major Edit]:::major-edit L2[Minor Edit]:::minor-edit L3[Context/No Edit]:::context end classDef major-edit fill:#90EE90 classDef minor-edit fill:#87CEEB classDef context fill:#FFFFFFNotes
Risk Assessment:⚠️ Medium Risk - While the core logic is straightforward, exact formatting replication between COBOL and Java requires careful validation. The fixed-width string formatting and file I/O behavior differences between languages create potential for subtle mismatches.
Session Info:
Implementation Notes:
String.format()with fixed-width specifiers to match COBOL's PIC clauses