-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CICE grid misaligned in some 0.1 deg configurations #190
Comments
Closing, as this is fixed in the current configurations. |
This was referenced Mar 11, 2020
Also note that this problem does not affect any of the 1deg or 0.25deg CICE
or
(these are all identical at each resolution) |
aekiss
added a commit
to COSIMA/ACCESS-OM2-1-025-010deg-report
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As noticed by @russfiedler here https://arccss.slack.com/archives/C9Q7Y1400/p1583821852038600
the CICE grid is misaligned in some 0.1 deg configurations, with U points located at the SE corner of T cells instead of the NE corner. As a consequence there are no U cells along the tripole fold (which should be along U points, since we use
ns_boundary_type=‘tripole’
).The faulty CICE
grid.nc
files arewhich are all identical.
The remaining, newer files
are identical and are not affected.
This problem affects
/g/data/hh5/tmp/cosima/access-om2-01/01deg_jra55v13_iaf
(used for Kiss et al., 2020) and/g/data/hh5/tmp/cosima/access-om2-01/01deg_jra55v13_ryf8485_spinup6*
and other runs of that era.The more recent RYF spinup
/g/data/hh5/tmp/cosima/access-om2-01/01deg_jra55v13_ryf9091
and the master branches of current RYF and IAF configurations https://github.com/COSIMA/01deg_jra55_ryf and https://github.com/COSIMA/01deg_jra55_iaf (and their minimal variants) are not affected, since they use/g/data/ik11/inputs/access-om2/input_08022019/cice_01deg/grid.nc
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: