-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tighten eps_imesh and eps_omesh #144
Comments
Strangely, making this change fails in cice at a collection of seemingly unrelated latitudes in 1 degree config:
We should be doing better than that right @aekiss ? EDIT: For mom, this is set in MOM_input, and is accurate to 1e-13 (i.e. add Extra note: This is probably the same problem as #116, seems better if i rename angleT to anglet in the grid.nc file |
Hm, odd to have a relative difference of ~1e-5 if it's supposed to be 1e-13. The largest of these differences (0.89719D-02) is about the 1/10th the scale of the 0.1° grid cells, ie ~1km. |
Yeah thankyou - it's because CICE is trying to internally calculate anglet from angle(u), rather than reading from the file. Once this is fixed (by renaming angleT to anglet in |
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
Closed through linked PRs EPS_OMESH and EPS_IMESH both set to 1e-13 |
This allows much stricter checking of angles in the ESMF files compared to the model grid files (per COSIMA/access-om3#144)
Using the default value (0.1) for
eps_imesh
allows a very generous error in latitude and longitude between the cmeps mesh files and the cice components grid.We can probably set this to 1e-7 or so? It is configurable through nuopc.runconfig
The
eps_omesh
default is better (0.0001) but could be stricter too?The values seem to only be used to set the allowable error between lon/lat values read from the mesh vs those read from the component grid file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: