Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconnect passive dlt-daemon when passive dlt-daemon becomes unrespon… #581

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jianjun-huang
Copy link

…sive

using DLT_SERVICE_ID_GET_DEFAULT_LOG_LEVEL message to detect whether dlt-daemon is active, then try to reconnect the passive dlt-daemon if the passive dlt-daemon is unresponsive

…sive

using DLT_SERVICE_ID_GET_DEFAULT_LOG_LEVEL message to detect whether dlt-daemon is active, then try to reconnect the passive dlt-daemon if the passive dlt-daemon is unresponsive
@minminlittleshrimp
Copy link
Collaborator

Look greate, on review.
Thank you!

@minminlittleshrimp
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @Bichdao021195
Please kindly compare this solution with the one using setsockopt() with TCP keepalive.
I would prefer using the internal method/implementation rather than depending on tcp lib if it is possible.

@minminlittleshrimp
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello @michael-methner
Kindly review this patch.
Thank you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

DLT-Multinode: Gateway does not recognize reset of passive node
2 participants