-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Recovery data to be discountinued #4465
Comments
Maybe the total number of recovered ones is not reliable, but then at least daily changes are needed, since this affects the number of active patients. |
Hi, just out of interest, is the discontinuation of recovered data because of scientific reasons or simply a decision not to track it? |
This decision puts the entire dataset provided by JHU in question. If data "accuracy" is the key reason for this decision, then you would stop reporting total cases. Scientifically, it is a fact that most asymptomatic cases go unreported, so the total case count would be unreliable as well. That data is still reported, however. The same holds true for deaths, since COVID was listed as the primary reason for people who died of other reasons, but tested positive for the virus. The simple (scientific) breakdown is this. Cumulative cases and deaths always rise. Cumulative/Death=Scary. Current cases and recoveries allow people to calculate the actual (relatively low) death rates. Current/Recovered=Context. Scary=Reported I'm done with JHU's data website and every product that sources its data. |
as a consequence of CSSEGISandData/COVID-19#4465
Why recovered cases data is discontinued? |
My guess is because all covid decisions are political now. Recovery data doesn’t show that we’re all going to die. LOL |
Further to #4369, we have made the decision to pull data for recoveries beginning August 4. After this date, the recovery data in the time series and recovery and active case data in the daily reports will be nullified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: