Is there an "official" fork?

[reaktivo]

This projects seems to be abandoned. Can we join efforts in a single repo? There seems to be a great amount of features being developed by some forks.

[stubbornella]

Which forks? I'll add collaborators to this repo.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Marcel Miranda notifications@github.com
wrote:

This projects seems to be abandoned. Can we join efforts in a single repo? There seems to be a great amount of features being developed by some forks.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#616

[reaktivo]

Well, there's at least two nice pull requests that I would love to see in the csslint project, and would resolve a bunch of problems.

• Added Ignore Capability Added ignore capability. #564
• Allow linting empty file Allow linting empty file #463

[bignimbus]

👍 but preferred solution would be for the admin to add maintainers to this repo

[Arcanemagus]

Just as some more evidence that something needs to be done, for the linter-csslint Atom package we have had to use an alternate fork until #605 and #606 are merged in here. I would absolutely love to delete that fork and use the official repository again!

[stubbornella]

Can we use this thread to start proposing collaborators? We'll also need to put together a code of conduct since it will be less of a poorly run monarchy. ;) Maybe there is one we can borrow from another project?

One of the a11y projects I've contributed to requires rough consensus amongst collaborators and green tests to merge. That seems good to me.

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Landon Abney notifications@github.com
wrote:

Just as some evidence that something needs to be done, for the linter-csslint Atom package we have had to use an alternate fork until #605 and #606 are merged in here. I would absolutely love to delete that fork and use the official repository again!

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#616 (comment)

[Arcanemagus]

Any takers? This project is looking rather abandoned currently...

[frvge]

There is more activity again so I'm closing this issue.