-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2D fillet chamfer #683
2D fillet chamfer #683
Conversation
Open question: do we want to expose those functions in the fluent API? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #683 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 94.21% 94.93% +0.72%
==========================================
Files 31 31
Lines 6702 8410 +1708
Branches 726 997 +271
==========================================
+ Hits 6314 7984 +1670
- Misses 253 264 +11
- Partials 135 162 +27
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @adam-urbanczyk
Looks like git got confused and re-added testCompSolid
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, the online OCCT docs are down right now, otherwise I would help out more with that chamfer2D stuff.
Co-authored-by: Marcus Boyd <mwb@geosol.com.au>
Thanks @adam-urbanczyk, this stuff looks great! That
Yeah, that would be great. I can think of a few options on how we do it in a fluent way, I'll start a new issue to discuss. |
* Implement 2D chamfers and fillets * Implement 2D chamfer/fillet tests Co-authored-by: Marcus Boyd <mwb@geosol.com.au>
Will resolve #348