Merge 1.0 branch into master

[lilleyse]

The updates here have already been reviewed, mostly in #308. The 1.0 changes should be ready to merge into master now.

Right after merging:

• Fix broken specification links. I did a search for 3d-tiles/tree/master/ and 3d-tiles/tree/1.0/ and these projects had links:
  • cesium
  • cesium.com
  • cesiumjs.org

@pjcozzi @ggetz is there anything left to add here?

[ggetz]

List looks good.

Maybe a final copy edit if @slchow has the time, but I don't think it's necessary in order to merge this.

[ggetz]

Only other thing I can think of is if we want to park current master in a branch because it has the start of some additional tile formats like VectorData, unless we want to carry over those changes here.

[ggetz]

Disregard my above comment, I see the next branch and #328

[lilleyse]

If not a branch, maybe a tag for the current master so we can reference it later as needed.

[lilleyse]

I pushed a 0.0 tag.

[slchow]

I could copyedit, but it would realistically be the end of next week at least before I could get to it. @lilleyse Do you want me to look it over?

[lilleyse]

I think it's fine to merge without a copyedit.

[ggetz]

@lilleyse I think we should also merge #329 before merging this.

[ggetz]

Fixed a few typos and published a new PDF. I think this should be ready to go.

[lilleyse]

I quickly glanced at the pdf - just some small things to address:

The majority of the content in this OGC document is a direct copy of the content contained at https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/3d-tiles/tree/1.0 (the 1.0 branch of the 3d-tiles repo). No normative changes have been made to the content. This OGC document does contain content not contained in the 1.0 branch of the 3d-tiles repo.

Would this note need to change? Should it instead refer to the 1.0 tag?

This also reminds me that the current 1.0 tag is now a few commits behind. Could you delete the existing tag and create a new 1.0 tag that points to the latest commit?

In the introduction section, and in other areas, some of the tile formats are written in a plural form, but they should be singular.

Batched 3D Models
Instanced 3D Models
Point Clouds

Batched 3D Model
Instanced 3D Model
Point Cloud

[lilleyse]

Otherwise looks great!

[ggetz]

Thanks @lilleyse! Made the fixes in the PDF, and now reference the tag instead of the branch.

I don't see any 1.0 tag however, should we create once we merge this PR?

[lilleyse]

Oh I was mixing up the tags...

But yeah, keep the 0.0 tag as-is and add a 1.0 rag right after merging this, and point to the 1.0 tag in the PDF (the link in the PDF should be https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/3d-tiles/releases/tag/1.0).

It also looks like some files got added accidentally to the last commit.

[ggetz]

Sounds good 👍

Whoops, removed the extra files, and updated.

[lilleyse]

In addition to creating the tag, could you also fix the now-broken spec links mentioned in the PR description?

That looks like everything. Thanks @ggetz!