-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invert classification #5836
Merged
Merged
Invert classification #5836
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8e7b0a6
Add option to invert classification.
bagnell 950afbf
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell f56364c
Update CHANGES.md.
bagnell 87088d4
Fix tests.
bagnell 601e050
Fix blinking when using skip LODs. Missing update to 3D Tiles stencil…
bagnell 24582c3
Add comment about 3D Tiles stencil test.
bagnell bd5f009
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell 3bdf457
Updates from review.
bagnell a89214c
Fix crash.
bagnell a05fc1c
Update doc.
bagnell 94eb17b
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell abaed6e
Update Sandcastle example after merge.
bagnell a2b12fb
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell b9ab3a8
Update Sandcastle example after merge.
bagnell 9f4cab0
Update CHANGES.md.
bagnell 2a53685
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell 5f60fa3
Updates from review.
bagnell d617556
Update Sandcastle example.
bagnell d89350b
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell 87289df
Update comment.
bagnell c4e886f
Merge branch 'master' into invert-classification
bagnell File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For my knowledge, remind me what limitation the 4 bits creates, e.g., can't have more than 16 tilesets in the same pixel?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See this comment when traversing 3D Tiles with the skip LOD optimization: https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium/blob/master/Source/Scene/Cesium3DTilesetTraversal.js#L167
Instead of a depth of 255, the depth would be limited to 15.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An unlikely, but potentially possible case now, right? But this is limited to just classification?
At the least, please add appropriate comments if you haven't already in case we need to investigate this in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's still very unlikely the selection depth will reach 15. I'll add a comment.