Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ZombieNet Support and CI Integration #2842

Closed
danforbes opened this issue Sep 17, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3192
Closed

ZombieNet Support and CI Integration #2842

danforbes opened this issue Sep 17, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3192
Labels
Epic Issue used to track development status of a complex feature, aggregates several issues

Comments

@danforbes
Copy link
Contributor

danforbes commented Sep 17, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Task summary

  • ZombieNet is a tool to easily spawn ephemeral Polkadot/Substrate networks and perform tests against them. This Epic will track the investigation into the capabilities that must be exposed by Gossamer in order to integrate with ZombieNet, including its CLI and DSL/domain-specific language. Once Gossamer can integrate with ZombieNet, ZombieNet should be used to drive enhanced CI/CD testing piplelines for Gossamer in order to make it easier to ensure that Gossamer nodes behave as expected in a number of different network topologies.
@danforbes danforbes added Epic Issue used to track development status of a complex feature, aggregates several issues tests and removed tests labels Sep 17, 2022
@sacha-l
Copy link

sacha-l commented Oct 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I'm not sure why the DSL docs aren't rendering as part of the official GitBook.

I think the Gitbook structure got moved around a little. This link should work: https://paritytech.github.io/zombienet/cli/test-dsl-definition-spec.html :)

@danforbes danforbes mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2022
Closed
@qdm12
Copy link
Contributor

qdm12 commented Nov 30, 2022

Discussing this on paritytech/zombienet#623 (sorry I wasn't aware/didn't search for this issue)

@timwu20 timwu20 mentioned this issue Mar 17, 2023
Closed
@edwardmack edwardmack mentioned this issue Mar 23, 2023
Closed
@edwardmack edwardmack mentioned this issue Apr 5, 2023
Merged
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.8.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Epic Issue used to track development status of a complex feature, aggregates several issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@danforbes @qdm12 @sacha-l