-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
client(consensus/grandpa): implement finality proof logic #3589
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jimjbrettj
requested review from
edwardmack,
timwu20,
EclesioMeloJunior,
kishansagathiya,
dimartiro and
kanishkatn
as code owners
November 17, 2023 19:52
EclesioMeloJunior
requested changes
Nov 20, 2023
timwu20
requested changes
Nov 21, 2023
timwu20
requested changes
Nov 28, 2023
EclesioMeloJunior
requested changes
Nov 28, 2023
kanishkatn
reviewed
Nov 30, 2023
EclesioMeloJunior
requested changes
Dec 4, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, I noticed that the function checkMessageSignature
can receive a signature that can be []byte
or string
, but why not set the signature type to be []byte
always, and then let the caller to transform the string
to []bytes
?
jimjbrettj
force-pushed
the
jimmy/finalityProof
branch
from
December 5, 2023 22:20
ee99f06
to
a170169
Compare
timwu20
requested changes
Dec 7, 2023
jimjbrettj
force-pushed
the
jimmy/finalityProof
branch
from
December 11, 2023 21:11
7bfdf68
to
01de9d3
Compare
timwu20
reviewed
Dec 12, 2023
EclesioMeloJunior
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2023
timwu20
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2023
jimjbrettj
force-pushed
the
jimmy/finalityProof
branch
from
December 13, 2023 17:32
10a7b5c
to
2e32df3
Compare
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
timwu20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: Timothy Wu <tim.wu@chainsafe.io>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Tests
go test ./client/consensus/grandpa
Issues
#3582
Primary Reviewer
@timwu20