feat: async shuffling refactor #6521
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ling from shufflingCache
…actual class in beacon-node and building mock
matthewkeil
commented
Mar 8, 2024
| let cachedState: CachedBeaconStateAllForks; | ||
| if (isCachedBeaconState(anchorState) && opts.skipCreateStateCacheIfAvailable) { | ||
| cachedState = anchorState; | ||
| cachedState.epochCtx.shufflingCache.addMetrics(metrics); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a bit of a funky edge case. I do not like adding the metrics here but there is an instance where the ShufflingCache need to be created before the metrics object (during genesis) and refactoring for that condition was not ideal. So in that circumstance the CachedBeaconState is built with a ShufflingCache and then when the seedState is passed into the chain the metrics are added to the class. This will be extended to also add the Logger when the worker thread for building is added.
matthewkeil
commented
Mar 8, 2024
| @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ describe("getShufflingForAttestationVerification", () => { | |||
| throw new Error("Unexpected input"); | |||
| } | |||
| }); | |||
| const expectedShuffling = {epoch: attEpoch} as EpochShuffling; | |||
| const expectedShuffling = {epoch: attEpoch} as unknown as EpochShuffling; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
epoch is no longer on EpochShuffling but using it here so there is something on the object to assert that its the same object
Performance Report✔️ no performance regression detected 🚀🚀 Significant benchmark improvement detected
Full benchmark results
|
|
this PR is not aligned with the high level design stated in in #6386 where it's recommended to move shuffling from
|
wemeetagain
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
| **/ | ||
| export const SHUFFLING_CACHE_MAX_EPOCHS = 4; | ||
|
|
||
| export enum ShufflingCacheCaller { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we don't actually need the caller, then we can move the implementation to beacon node like we talked about.
| this.nextActiveIndices = epochTransitionCache.nextEpochShufflingActiveValidatorIndices; | ||
| this.nextShufflingDecisionRoot = getShufflingDecisionBlock(state, this.nextEpoch); | ||
| this.shufflingCache | ||
| .build(state, this.nextEpoch, this.nextShufflingDecisionRoot, this.nextActiveIndices) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought we wanted to start the build afterwards in beacon-node
| this.syncParticipantReward = computeSyncParticipantReward(this.totalActiveBalanceIncrements); | ||
| this.syncProposerReward = Math.floor(this.syncParticipantReward * PROPOSER_WEIGHT_FACTOR); | ||
| this.baseRewardPerIncrement = computeBaseRewardPerIncrement(this.totalActiveBalanceIncrements); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.previousTargetUnslashedBalanceIncrements = this.currentTargetUnslashedBalanceIncrements; | ||
| this.currentTargetUnslashedBalanceIncrements = 0; | ||
|
|
||
| // Advance time units |
| /** | ||
| * Returns hex string representation of the block root for a given state and epoch | ||
| */ | ||
| export function getShufflingDecisionBlock(state: BeaconStateAllForks, epoch: Epoch): RootHex { |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
** NOTE: Note ready for review, but want to trigger CI **
Motivation
Move calculation of next shuffling to async to get it off of critical path during epoch transition. There is a full second during epoch transition used to calculate the
epochCtx.nextShufflingand that can be moved to an async process. Refactored a few pieces of theEpochCacheto make this work and will continue this by creating a worker that moves this calculation to a worker thread. By using a worker thread that is tuned down with NICE we can interleave the long calculation into thread idle time which is ideal. To be continued...Description
beacon-nodetostate-transitionEpochCacheso its available for debugging issues with shuffling builds