Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: modify license structure to include apache2 #6835

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

philknows
Copy link
Member

Motivation

To clarify confusion about which parts of Lodestar are under which open source licenses. Github automatically detects what is under license but our repository has 2 difference licenses in place depending on the package.

Description

This PR makes it clear which packages of Lodestar are under which open-source license. This also fixes the automatic detection mechanism Github uses to display under "About" what licenses this repository has so it displays both Apache 2.0 and LGPL 3.0.

The following are licensed under LGPL 3.0:

  • lodestar/packages/beacon-node
  • lodestar/packages/cli
  • lodestar/packages/validator

The following are licensed under Apache 2.0:

  • lodestar/packages/api
  • lodestar/packages/config
  • lodestar/packages/db
  • lodestar/packages/flare
  • lodestar/packages/fork-choice
  • lodestar/packages/light-client
  • lodestar/packages/logger
  • lodestar/packages/params
  • lodestar/packages/reqresp
  • lodestar/packages/spec-test-util
  • lodestar/packages/state-transition
  • lodestar/packages/test-utils
  • lodestar/packages/types
  • lodestar/packages/utils

@philknows philknows requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 15:05
@wemeetagain wemeetagain merged commit 2249ac1 into ChainSafe:unstable Jun 4, 2024
20 checks passed
@wemeetagain
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in v1.20.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants