For #985: use round instead of floor for highestVisibleXIndex #1000
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
liuxuan30
force-pushed
the
highestVisibleXIndex
branch
from
be87156 to
5c148ae
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For #985:
I had regression on my side:
pt.x now is 25.0, if we print it, but in the memory, it looks like 24.999999993, so floor(pt.x) would be 24, while it should be 25.0?
So I checked #785, #794, I think they are ONLY related to lowestVisibleXIndex, because old code has "+1" appended. The latest code removed +1.
However, I think highestVisibleXIndex should stick to round as mentioned above.
@danielgindi did you meet any out of range issue because of using round? e.g. round(25.6) -> 26 while it should be 25.
This is kind of tricky, and we may want to review this carefully.
If you need a gitter chat, let me know