Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

-Wsometimes-uninitialized in drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c #400

Closed
nathanchance opened this issue Feb 26, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

-Wsometimes-uninitialized in drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c #400

nathanchance opened this issue Feb 26, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
-Wsometimes-uninitialized [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. [FIXED][LINUX] 5.2 This bug was fixed in Linux 5.2

Comments

@nathanchance
Copy link
Member

Meta: #381

drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c:126:13: error: variable 'timebase' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]

in img_pwm_config. Final else if should probably just be an else.

@nathanchance nathanchance added good first issue Good for newcomers [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority -Wsometimes-uninitialized labels Feb 26, 2019
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member Author

@nathanchance nathanchance self-assigned this Mar 7, 2019
@nathanchance nathanchance added [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review and removed good first issue Good for newcomers low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority labels Mar 7, 2019
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member Author

@nathanchance nathanchance added [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream and removed [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review labels Mar 21, 2019
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member Author

@nathanchance nathanchance added [FIXED][LINUX] 5.2 This bug was fixed in Linux 5.2 and removed [PATCH] Accepted A submitted patch has been accepted upstream labels May 10, 2019
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2020
Some meson pll registers can be initialized with 0 as N value, introducing
the following division by 0 when computing rate :

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c:75:9
  division by zero
  CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.0-rc3-608075-g86c9af8630e1-dirty #400
  Call trace:
   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1c0
   show_stack+0x14/0x20
   dump_stack+0xc4/0x100
   ubsan_epilogue+0x14/0x68
   __ubsan_handle_divrem_overflow+0x98/0xb8
   __pll_params_to_rate+0xdc/0x140
   meson_clk_pll_recalc_rate+0x278/0x3a0
   __clk_register+0x7c8/0xbb0
   devm_clk_hw_register+0x54/0xc0
   meson_eeclkc_probe+0xf4/0x1a0
   platform_drv_probe+0x54/0xd8
   really_probe+0x16c/0x438
   driver_probe_device+0xb0/0xf0
   device_driver_attach+0x94/0xa0
   __driver_attach+0x70/0x108
   bus_for_each_dev+0xd8/0x128
   driver_attach+0x30/0x40
   bus_add_driver+0x1b0/0x2d8
   driver_register+0xbc/0x1d0
   __platform_driver_register+0x78/0x88
   axg_driver_init+0x18/0x20
   do_one_initcall+0xc8/0x24c
   kernel_init_freeable+0x2b0/0x344
   kernel_init+0x10/0x128
   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

This checks if N is null before doing the division.

Fixes: 7a29a86 ("clk: meson: Add support for Meson clock controller")
Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
[jbrunet@baylibre.com: update the comment in above the fix]
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 3, 2020
GFP_KERNEL flag specifies a normal kernel allocation in which executing
in process context without any locks and can sleep.
mmio_diff takes sometime to finish all the diff compare and it has
locks, continue using GFP_KERNEL will output below trace if LOCKDEP
enabled.

Use GFP_ATOMIC instead.

V2: Rebase.

=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.7.0-rc2 #400 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
is trying to acquire:
ffffffffb47bea20 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x0/0x30

               and this task is already holding:
ffff88845b85cc90 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0
which would create a new lock dependency:
 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} -> (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}

               but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}

               ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
  lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40
  shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0
  notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0
  __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0
  execlists_schedule_out+0x42a/0x820
  process_csb+0xe7/0x3e0
  execlists_submission_tasklet+0x5c/0x1d0
  tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0xeb/0x260
  __do_softirq+0x11d/0x56f
  irq_exit+0xf6/0x100
  do_IRQ+0x7f/0x160
  ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a
  cpuidle_enter_state+0xcd/0x5b0
  cpuidle_enter+0x37/0x60
  do_idle+0x337/0x3f0
  cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
  start_kernel+0x58b/0x5c5
  secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0

               to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}

               ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
  lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
  fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
  kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290
  alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0
  init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0
  workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb
  kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325
  kernel_init+0x8/0x116
  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50

               other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(fs_reclaim);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock);
                               lock(fs_reclaim);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock);

                *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by cat/1439:
 #0: ffff888444a23698 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read+0x49/0x680
 #1: ffff88845b858068 (&gvt->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xc7/0x2e0
 #2: ffff88845b85cc90 (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0

               the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (&gvt->scheduler.mmio_context_lock){+.-.}-{2:2} ops: 31 {
   HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
                    lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                    _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x2f/0x40
                    vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0xcf/0x2e0
                    seq_read+0x242/0x680
                    full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0
                    vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0
                    ksys_read+0xc4/0x160
                    do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290
                    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
   IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
                    lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                    _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40
                    shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0
                    notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0
                    __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0
                    execlists_schedule_out+0x42a/0x820
                    process_csb+0xe7/0x3e0
                    execlists_submission_tasklet+0x5c/0x1d0
                    tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0xeb/0x260
                    __do_softirq+0x11d/0x56f
                    irq_exit+0xf6/0x100
                    do_IRQ+0x7f/0x160
                    ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a
                    cpuidle_enter_state+0xcd/0x5b0
                    cpuidle_enter+0x37/0x60
                    do_idle+0x337/0x3f0
                    cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20
                    start_kernel+0x58b/0x5c5
                    secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
   INITIAL USE at:
                   lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                   _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x2b/0x40
                   shadow_context_status_change+0xfe/0x2f0
                   notifier_call_chain+0x6a/0xa0
                   __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xf0
                   execlists_schedule_in+0x2c8/0x690
                   __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x1303/0x1930
                   execlists_submit_request+0x1e7/0x230
                   submit_notify+0x105/0x2a4
                   __i915_sw_fence_complete+0xaa/0x380
                   __engine_park+0x313/0x5a0
                   ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x3e/0x90
                   intel_gt_resume+0x41e/0x440
                   intel_gt_init+0x283/0xbc0
                   i915_gem_init+0x197/0x240
                   i915_driver_probe+0xc2d/0x12e0
                   i915_pci_probe+0xa2/0x1e0
                   local_pci_probe+0x6f/0xb0
                   pci_device_probe+0x171/0x230
                   really_probe+0x17a/0x380
                   driver_probe_device+0x70/0xf0
                   device_driver_attach+0x82/0x90
                   __driver_attach+0x60/0x100
                   bus_for_each_dev+0xe4/0x140
                   bus_add_driver+0x257/0x2a0
                   driver_register+0xd3/0x150
                   i915_init+0x6d/0x80
                   do_one_initcall+0xb8/0x3a0
                   kernel_init_freeable+0x2b4/0x325
                   kernel_init+0x8/0x116
                   ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
 }
__key.77812+0x0/0x40
 ... acquired at:
   lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
   fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260
   mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150
   intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140
   vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0
   seq_read+0x242/0x680
   full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0
   vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0
   ksys_read+0xc4/0x160
   do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3

               the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
 and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0} ops: 1999031 {
   HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
                    lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                    fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
                    kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290
                    alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0
                    init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0
                    workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb
                    kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325
                    kernel_init+0x8/0x116
                    ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
   SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
                    lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                    fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
                    kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290
                    alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0
                    init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0
                    workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb
                    kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325
                    kernel_init+0x8/0x116
                    ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
   INITIAL USE at:
                   lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
                   fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
                   kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x2e/0x290
                   alloc_worker+0x2b/0xb0
                   init_rescuer.part.0+0x17/0xe0
                   workqueue_init+0x293/0x3bb
                   kernel_init_freeable+0x149/0x325
                   kernel_init+0x8/0x116
                   ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
 }
__fs_reclaim_map+0x0/0x60
 ... acquired at:
   lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
   fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260
   mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150
   intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140
   vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0
   seq_read+0x242/0x680
   full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0
   vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0
   ksys_read+0xc4/0x160
   do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3

               stack backtrace:
CPU: 5 PID: 1439 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.7.0-rc2 #400
Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC8i7BEH/NUC8BEB, BIOS BECFL357.86A.0056.2018.1128.1717 11/28/2018
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x97/0xe0
 check_irq_usage.cold+0x428/0x434
 ? check_usage_forwards+0x2c0/0x2c0
 ? class_equal+0x11/0x20
 ? __bfs+0xd2/0x2d0
 ? in_any_class_list+0xa0/0xa0
 ? check_path+0x22/0x40
 ? check_noncircular+0x150/0x2b0
 ? print_circular_bug.isra.0+0x1b0/0x1b0
 ? mark_lock+0x13d/0xc50
 ? __lock_acquire+0x1e32/0x39b0
 __lock_acquire+0x1e32/0x39b0
 ? timerqueue_add+0xc1/0x130
 ? register_lock_class+0xa60/0xa60
 ? mark_lock+0x13d/0xc50
 lock_acquire+0x175/0x4e0
 ? __zone_pcp_update+0x80/0x80
 ? check_flags.part.0+0x210/0x210
 ? mark_held_locks+0x65/0x90
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x32/0x40
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x190/0x290
 ? fwtable_read32+0x163/0x480
 ? mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150
 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x20/0x30
 ? __zone_pcp_update+0x80/0x80
 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2e/0x260
 mmio_diff_handler+0xc0/0x150
 ? vgpu_mmio_diff_open+0x30/0x30
 intel_gvt_for_each_tracked_mmio+0x7b/0x140
 vgpu_mmio_diff_show+0x111/0x2e0
 ? mmio_diff_handler+0x150/0x150
 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa0/0xb0
 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xc0/0xc0
 ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x33/0x40
 ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xc2/0xd0
 seq_read+0x242/0x680
 ? debugfs_locked_down.isra.0+0x70/0x70
 full_proxy_read+0x95/0xc0
 vfs_read+0xc2/0x1b0
 ksys_read+0xc4/0x160
 ? kernel_write+0xb0/0xb0
 ? mark_held_locks+0x24/0x90
 do_syscall_64+0x63/0x290
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3
RIP: 0033:0x7ffbe3e6efb2
Code: c0 e9 c2 fe ff ff 50 48 8d 3d ca cb 0a 00 e8 f5 19 02 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 56 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24
RSP: 002b:00007ffd021c08a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000020000 RCX: 00007ffbe3e6efb2
RDX: 0000000000020000 RSI: 00007ffbe34cd000 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007ffbe34cd000 R08: 00007ffbe34cc010 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000022 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000562b6f0a11f0
R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000020000 R15: 0000000000020000
------------[ cut here ]------------

Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200601035556.19999-1-colin.xu@intel.com
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-Wsometimes-uninitialized [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. [FIXED][LINUX] 5.2 This bug was fixed in Linux 5.2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant