replace PODArray with PODArrayWithStackMemory in AggregateFunctionWindowFunnelData #18817
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en
Changelog category (leave one):
Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):
Replace
PODArray
withPODArrayWithStackMemory
inAggregateFunctionWindowFunnelData
to improvementwindowFunnel
function performance.Detailed description / Documentation draft:
Funnel analysis is very useful in many scenarios.
In Tencent, we use
windowFunnel
aggregate function to analyze user events, and it's slow. we profile with perf and found that lots of time is used in memory allocation, CPU utilization is not very high.We consider the implementation of this function, and analyze it with specific sql, then we found that usually, we always caculate
windowFunnel
with group byuserid
and lots of fileter condition, for example:After filter, each user's event list is not very big, so we replace
PODArray
withPODArrayWithStackMemory
inAggregateFunctionWindowFunnelData
and gain a lot of performance improvement, maybe we should consider about the implementation here?