Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Less contention in cache, part 4 #61250

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
May 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kssenii
Copy link
Member

@kssenii kssenii commented Mar 12, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Less contention in filesystem cache (part 4). Allow to keep filesystem cache not filled to the limit by doing additional eviction in the background (controlled by keep_free_space_size(elements)_ratio). This allows to release pressure from space reservation for queries (on tryReserve method). Also this is done in a lock free way as much as possible, e.g. should not block normal cache usage.

Contains commits from #61163, so should be merged/reviewed after.

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/


Modify your CI run:

NOTE: If your merge the PR with modified CI you MUST KNOW what you are doing
NOTE: Checked options will be applied if set before CI RunConfig/PrepareRunConfig step

Include tests (required builds will be added automatically):

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Unit tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with Analyzer
  • Add your option here

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • Add your option here

Extra options:

  • do not test (only style check)
  • disable merge-commit (no merge from master before tests)
  • disable CI cache (job reuse)

Only specified batches in multi-batch jobs:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Mar 12, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll commented Mar 12, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 3f9ca1c with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help❌ failure
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integrational tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success

@kssenii kssenii force-pushed the less-contentaion-in-cache-part4 branch from 39d1c10 to bb55a0c Compare March 13, 2024 10:15
@kssenii kssenii marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2024 16:40
@jkartseva jkartseva self-assigned this Apr 25, 2024
@kssenii kssenii force-pushed the less-contentaion-in-cache-part4 branch from db0e2c0 to 3e4d9bf Compare April 28, 2024 12:08
src/Interpreters/Cache/FileCache.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Interpreters/Cache/FileCache.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Interpreters/Cache/FileCache.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Interpreters/Cache/FileCache.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
if (limits_satisfied)
keep_up_free_space_ratio_task->scheduleAfter(general_reschedule_ms);
else
keep_up_free_space_ratio_task->schedule();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if it's a realistic scenario: if a task fails to free up the space repetitively (collectCandidatesForEviction returns false), it will be re-scheduled for immediate processing. Can it stuck in this state?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it is not a realistic scenario that we fail to free up required space because of not enough evictable/freeable cache entries, but limits_satisfied will also be false if we did not free up all the needed space because of the eviction batch size (by default it is quite small), so I thought it makes sense to schedule immediately in this case. I do not think it can get stuck in this state because this could possibly happen if cache constantly grows in size at a high speed, but in this case we should also get into lock contention case and get into another reschedule here:

auto lock = tryLockCache();
/// To avoid deteriorating contention on cache,
/// proceed only if cache is not heavily used.
if (!lock)

I will add profile event for the number of eviction tries, so we will be able to see if it is stuck in constant reschedule on the dashboard.

@kssenii
Copy link
Member Author

kssenii commented May 2, 2024

Looks like 02967_analyzer_fuzz is broken, but not related to changes (#63264)

Stateless tests (asan) [3/4] — fail: 1

02967_analyzer_fuzz

Stateless tests (debug) [4/5] — fail: 1

02967_analyzer_fuzz

Stateless tests (release) — fail: 1, passed: 6497, skipped: 12

02967_analyzer_fuzz

Stateless tests (tsan) [4/5] — fail: 1, passed: 1244, skipped: 18

02967_analyzer_fuzz

Stateless tests (ubsan) [1/2] — fail: 1, passed: 3201, skipped: 31

02967_analyzer_fuzz

Upgrade check (debug) — New settings are not reflected in settings changes history

It complains about:

   ┌─name──────────────────────────────┐
1. │ allow_experimental_join_condition │
   └───────────────────────────────────┘

so not related to changes as well

AST fuzzer (ubsan)

#56640

@kssenii kssenii enabled auto-merge May 2, 2024 14:40
@kssenii kssenii added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks May 2, 2024
@kssenii kssenii added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 33a0e80 May 2, 2024
192 of 219 checks passed
@kssenii kssenii deleted the less-contentaion-in-cache-part4 branch May 2, 2024 15:31
@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants