Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Experiment] what if reorder compare of columns in Merge #63780

Merged

Conversation

UnamedRus
Copy link
Contributor

@UnamedRus UnamedRus commented May 14, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Performance Improvement

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Start to compare rows from most likely unequal columns first.

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

Modify your CI run

NOTE: If your merge the PR with modified CI you MUST KNOW what you are doing
NOTE: Checked options will be applied if set before CI RunConfig/PrepareRunConfig step

Include tests (required builds will be added automatically):

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Unit tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with Analyzer
  • All with Azure
  • Add your option here

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • Add your option here

Extra options:

  • do not test (only style check)
  • disable merge-commit (no merge from master before tests)
  • disable CI cache (job reuse)

Only specified batches in multi-batch jobs:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

@nikitamikhaylov nikitamikhaylov added the can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors label May 14, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added the pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements label May 14, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll4
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll4 commented May 14, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit c8af4a0 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
BuildsThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integration tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts✅ success

@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Member

Did it help?

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov added the close in a month if not active This will be closed in case of no information label Sep 26, 2024
@UnamedRus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Did it help?

Doesn't seems so.
But may be, i was bad on making good test for that.

@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Member

We need at least one proof, even synthetic will be ok.

@UnamedRus
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test with LC(String)

New 
SELECT count()
FROM test_reorder_columns_in_merge
FINAL
SETTINGS max_threads = 1

   ┌──count()─┐
1. │ 60000000 │ -- 60.00 million
   └──────────┘

1 row in set. Elapsed: 3.120 sec. Processed 59.91 million rows, 479.32 MB (19.20 million rows/s., 153.63 MB/s.)
Peak memory usage: 4.06 MiB.

Old
SELECT count()
FROM test_reorder_columns_in_merge
FINAL
SETTINGS max_threads = 1

   ┌──count()─┐
1. │ 60000000 │ -- 60.00 million
   └──────────┘

1 row in set. Elapsed: 4.134 sec. Processed 59.91 million rows, 479.32 MB (14.49 million rows/s., 115.94 MB/s.)
Peak memory usage: 4.06 MiB.

{
for (size_t i = 0; i < size; ++i)
{
auto col_number = (offset + i) % size;
Copy link
Member

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov Dec 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm afraid of this division - change to something like if and reset to zero.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@UnamedRus UnamedRus Dec 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure that simple reset to 0 will work

But something like, could.
But not sure that it's better. (and size_t cannot be negative, so different type)

if ((offset + i) == size)
   offset -= size;

auto col_number = (offset + i);

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov self-assigned this Dec 29, 2024
@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into ClickHouse:master with commit b0d8549 Dec 29, 2024
220 of 225 checks passed
@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Dec 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
can be tested Allows running workflows for external contributors close in a month if not active This will be closed in case of no information pr-performance Pull request with some performance improvements pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants