Input objects support default values

[paales]

Input objects support default values and we'd like to get this supported in the generated schema: http://spec.graphql.org/June2018/#sec-Input-Objects

enum PageType {
  PUBLIC
  BASIC_AUTH
}
input PageInput {
  pageType: PageType! = PUBLIC
  greeting: String = "Hello"
  score: Int = 100
  ratio: Float = 0.5
  isMember: Boolean = true
}

Should be able to generate the following:

export const PageTypeSchema = z.nativeEnum(PageType);

export function PageInputSchema(): z.ZodObject<Properties<PageInput>> {
  return z.object({
    pageType: PageTypeSchema.default("PUBLIC"),
    greeting: z.string().default("Hello").nullish(),
    score: z.number().default(100).nullish(),
    ratio: z.number().default(0.5).nullish(),
    isMember: z.boolean().default(true).nullish()
  })
}

This PR is not complete, but I wanted to start a conversation about supporting this.

To make this a complete PR there needs to happen a few things in my opinion:

• Decide how to handle more complex default values like lists / objects (can we omit this for now?)
• How to handle nullish values here, should we keep the 'nullish' here?
• Implement similar functionality for the other schema's

[Code-Hex]

@paales Thanks for your nice suggestions!

I think we can omit lists / objects for now. But we need to write README about this.

Decide how to handle more complex default values like lists / objects (can we omit this for now?)

What do you mean nullish?
If you mean Null Value, I think we can omit for now (as same as lists / objects)

How to handle nullish values here, should we keep the 'nullish' here?

Yes. this is required.

Implement similar functionality for the other schema's

Please remove d0809b1 commit If you want to work on this PR 🙏

[paales]

Thanks for the green light on this!

Please remove d0809b1 commit If you want to work on this PR 🙏

This commit isn't in this repository, it is in our repository, just referencing this PR :)

[Code-Hex]

@paales I see!

[Code-Hex]

@paales What do you have plan (period) to implement for this?

[paales]

@Code-Hex Uhhmm, I haven't gotten around to it yet. Not sure when I'll be able to get around to it.

[Code-Hex]

@paales Thank you for your reply.
It looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while, so I'll close it for now.

I moved to #449