Skip to content

Update khronos queues #549

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2016
Merged

Update khronos queues #549

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 13, 2016

Conversation

podviaznikov
Copy link
Member

@podviaznikov podviaznikov commented Sep 13, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Rename khronos queues

CodeNow/khronos#110

Dependencies

  • list dependencies (eg, PR from another branch or repo; tags or versions required prior to deployment)

Reviewers

  • person_1
  • person_2

Tests

Test any modifications on one of our environments.

  • tested on environment by someone

Deployment (post-merge)

Ensure that all environments have the given changes.

  • deployed to epsilon
  • deployed to gamma
  • deployed to delta

@podviaznikov podviaznikov mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2016
Merged
anandkumarpatel
anandkumarpatel reviewed Sep 13, 2016
View reviewed changes
ansible/group_vars/alpha-khronos.yml
khronos:images:prune \
khronos:instances:cleanup \
khronos:weave:prune"
containers.image-builder:prune \
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One : left

@podviaznikov podviaznikov changed the title Udate khronos queues Update khronos queues Sep 13, 2016
@anandkumarpatel
Copy link

@podviaznikov podviaznikov merged commit 0724758 into master Sep 13, 2016
@podviaznikov podviaznikov deleted the rename-khronos-queues branch September 13, 2016 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@podviaznikov @anandkumarpatel