Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Term Entry]Py torch tensors .mean() #5655

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Radhika-okhade
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

A new term entry about the .mean() method for Tensors.

Issue Solved

#5062

Type of Change

  • Adding a new entry

Checklist

  • [/ ] All writings are my own.
  • [ /] My entry follows the Codecademy Docs style guide.
  • [ /] My changes generate no new warnings.
  • [ /] I have performed a self-review of my own writing and code.
  • [ /] I have checked my entry and corrected any misspellings.
  • [ /] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed.
  • [ /] I have confirmed my changes are not being pushed from my forked main branch.
  • [ /] I have confirmed that I'm pushing from a new branch named after the changes I'm making.
  • [ /] I have linked any issues that are relevant to this PR in the Issues Solved section.

@SaviDahegaonkar SaviDahegaonkar self-assigned this Nov 21, 2024
@SaviDahegaonkar SaviDahegaonkar added new entry New entry or entries pytorch PyTorch labels Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@SaviDahegaonkar SaviDahegaonkar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Radhika-okhade,
The entry is nicely written. Thank you for contributing to Codecademy Docs! This entry looks good to get merged. 🚀

content/pytorch/concepts/tensors/mean/mean.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants