You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I look at the name: "Compression Level", I assume the higher is the compression, the smaller is the image ( not sure if this is the case)
This is also confirmed by the description: "A higher compression means a loss in quality, so basically you are saying if I select high, I might lose quality.
Then when I check with the sample image thing, lower compression, results in smaller images ( lower quality).
Expected behavior
I would expect that images with higher compression results in the smallest ones.
Possible solutions:
Keep the same slider and change the title/description :
a) Image quality
Lower image quality might not always be perceived by users and would result in a boost of your loading speed by lowering the page size. Try experimenting with the setting, then click the view sample image link to see what option works best for you.
#### [Version 2.2.3](v2.2.2...v2.2.3) (2019-11-05)
* **Bug Fixes**
* change minimum slider range for compression to 50 instead of 0 ([592c3e2](592c3e2))
* image quality setting description, fix [#162](#162) ([60cbe5e](60cbe5e))
* improve description for background image lazyload fix [#163](#163) ([f0f190b](f0f190b))
* upgrade notice when user is close to visits limit ([ff716f7](ff716f7))
Describe the bug
After ignoring it for a while, when I gave it a fresh read I was confused by the setting name + description : https://www.dropbox.com/s/qn2otqtsn1woyko/Screenshot%202019-10-22%2010.21.07.png?dl=0
If I look at the name: "Compression Level", I assume the higher is the compression, the smaller is the image ( not sure if this is the case)
This is also confirmed by the description: "A higher compression means a loss in quality, so basically you are saying if I select high, I might lose quality.
Then when I check with the sample image thing, lower compression, results in smaller images ( lower quality).
Expected behavior
I would expect that images with higher compression results in the smallest ones.
Possible solutions:
a) Image quality
Lower image quality might not always be perceived by users and would result in a boost of your loading speed by lowering the page size. Try experimenting with the setting, then click the view sample image link to see what option works best for you.
cc @selul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: