Outdated doc for AlphaTex regarding the support of multi-track? #572
-
I'm wondering if the statement as highlighted below still holds true. With |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
First of all: welcome to alphaTab. Nice to see a new face here. 😁 For the future: please directly create a discussion. 😞 I think our contribution information in this repo is quite clear on the fact that when you have general questions, you should create a discussion. Also the templates mention that the template usage is mandatory. It is really exhausting that so many people are simply ignoring all the information and just drop an issue ignoring all my remarks 😭. I migrated the issue to a discussion this time. On topic: indeed the documentation is outdated. Multitrack and multi-staff rendering was added as part of #207 and it is available since the 1.0 release. There is an own chapter about tracks and staves in the alphaTex docs: https://www.alphatab.net/docs/alphatex/tracks-staves |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
First of all: welcome to alphaTab. Nice to see a new face here. 😁
For the future: please directly create a discussion. 😞 I think our contribution information in this repo is quite clear on the fact that when you have general questions, you should create a discussion. Also the templates mention that the template usage is mandatory. It is really exhausting that so many people are simply ignoring all the information and just drop an issue ignoring all my remarks 😭. I migrated the issue to a discussion this time.
On topic: indeed the documentation is outdated. Multitrack and multi-staff rendering was added as part of #207 and it is available since the 1.0 release. There is an own chapter abou…