Enhancements in Token Clipping, PR Statistics Calculation, and Conditional Review Labeling #848
Conversation
|
PR Description updated to latest commit (8a5b01b)
|
PR Review(Review updated until commit 8a5b01b)
✨ Review tool usage guide:Overview: The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
PR Code Suggestions
✨ Improve tool usage guide:Overview:
See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
/review auto_approve |
![codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Auto-approved PR |
|
/describe |
codiumai-pr-agent-pro
bot
changed the title
|
PR Description updated to latest commit (8a5b01b)
|
|
/custom_suggestions --pr_custom_suggestions.prompt="The suggestions should focus only on the following: |
PR Custom Suggestions
✨ Usage guide:Overview: Unlike the The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. With a https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/, use the following template: Using a configuration file is recommended, since it allows to use multi-line instructions. Don't forget - with this tool, you are the prompter. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. You might benefit from several trial-and-error iterations, until you get the correct prompt for your use case.
See the custom suggestions usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
PR Description updated to latest commit (8a5b01b)
|
PR Custom Suggestions
✨ Usage guide:Overview: Unlike the The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. With a https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/, use the following template: Using a configuration file is recommended, since it allows to use multi-line instructions. Don't forget - with this tool, you are the prompter. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. You might benefit from several trial-and-error iterations, until you get the correct prompt for your use case.
See the custom suggestions usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
/custom_suggestions |
PR Custom Suggestions
✨ Usage guide:Overview: Unlike the The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. With a https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/, use the following template: Using a configuration file is recommended, since it allows to use multi-line instructions. Don't forget - with this tool, you are the prompter. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. You might benefit from several trial-and-error iterations, until you get the correct prompt for your use case.
See the custom suggestions usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
/help |
PR Agent Walkthrough🤖 Welcome to the PR Agent, an AI-powered tool for automated pull request analysis, feedback, suggestions and more. Here is a list of tools you can use to interact with the PR Agent:
(1) Note that each tool be triggered automatically when a new PR is opened, or called manually by commenting on a PR. (2) Tools marked with [*] require additional parameters to be passed. For example, to invoke the |
PR Custom Suggestions
✨ Usage guide:Overview: Unlike the The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR. With a https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/, use the following template: Using a configuration file is recommended, since it allows to use multi-line instructions. Don't forget - with this tool, you are the prompter. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. You might benefit from several trial-and-error iterations, until you get the correct prompt for your use case.
See the custom suggestions usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
|
No user prompt detected. Skipping custom suggestions generation. |
|
/review --pr_reviewer.inline_code_comments=true |
|
Persistent review updated to latest commit 8a5b01b |
|
/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true |
PR Code Suggestions
✨ Improve tool usage guide:Overview:
See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool. |
| @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ def clip_tokens(text: str, max_tokens: int, add_three_dots=True) -> str: | |||
| num_output_chars = int(chars_per_token * max_tokens) | |||
| clipped_text = text[:num_output_chars] | |||
| if add_three_dots: | |||
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" | |||
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider removing the newline character before the truncation message to maintain the consistency of the text format, especially if the text is expected to be in a single line or paragraph format. [enhancement]
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" |
| get_logger().exception(f"Failed to calculate PR statistics, error: {e}") | ||
| return {} | ||
| return out | ||
| return {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: The new implementation of calc_pr_statistics returns an empty dictionary, which removes the functionality to calculate PR statistics. If this is intentional and temporary, consider adding a TODO comment to restore the functionality later. Otherwise, reimplement the method to provide meaningful statistics based on the pull_request_data. [possible issue]
| return {} | |
| # TODO: Implement the calculation of PR statistics or restore previous functionality | |
| return {} |
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Adding a condition to check publish_output before setting review labels is a good practice for conditional execution. However, consider logging a message when skipping the setting of review labels for clarity and debugging purposes. [enhancement]
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | |
| return | |
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | |
| get_logger().info("Skipping setting review labels as publish_output is disabled.") | |
| return |
| @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ def test_clip(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| max_tokens = 10 | |||
| result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli ...(truncated)' | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli\n...(truncated)' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: The test expectation has been updated to match the new output of clip_tokens function. Ensure that this change is consistent with the desired output format across all tests and usage scenarios, considering the added newline character before the truncation indicator. [possible issue]
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli\n...(truncated)' | |
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli ...(truncated)' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes walkthrough
Enhancement
| |||
Tests
|
|
/review
|
|
Persistent review updated to latest commit 8a5b01b |
| @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ def clip_tokens(text: str, max_tokens: int, add_three_dots=True) -> str: | |||
| num_output_chars = int(chars_per_token * max_tokens) | |||
| clipped_text = text[:num_output_chars] | |||
| if add_three_dots: | |||
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" | |||
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling cases where the input text ends with a newline character. Appending "\n...(truncated)" directly might result in two newline characters in a row, which could be unintended. A simple check to see if clipped_text ends with a newline before appending could prevent this. [medium]
| get_logger().exception(f"Failed to calculate PR statistics, error: {e}") | ||
| return {} | ||
| return out | ||
| return {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While simplifying the calc_pr_statistics function to return an empty dictionary is a straightforward approach, consider implementing a minimal placeholder functionality that can be expanded easily. This could maintain the method's utility for future enhancements without leaving it as a stub. [medium]
| @@ -357,6 +357,9 @@ def _can_run_incremental_review(self) -> bool: | |||
| return True | |||
|
|
|||
| def set_review_labels(self, data): | |||
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure that the condition if not get_settings().config.publish_output: is thoroughly tested in scenarios where publish_output might be dynamically changed. This addition introduces conditional logic that could affect the flow of setting review labels. [important]
| @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ def test_clip(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| max_tokens = 10 | |||
| result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli ...(truncated)' | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli\n...(truncated)' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given the change in clip_tokens to append a newline before the truncation indicator, ensure that all edge cases are covered in the tests, such as clipping at different points in the text and with various lengths of input text. This will help ensure that the new behavior is consistent and reliable. [important]
| @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ def clip_tokens(text: str, max_tokens: int, add_three_dots=True) -> str: | |||
| num_output_chars = int(chars_per_token * max_tokens) | |||
| clipped_text = text[:num_output_chars] | |||
| if add_three_dots: | |||
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" | |||
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Consider removing the newline character before the truncation message to maintain the consistency of the text output format. [enhancement]
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" |
| get_logger().exception(f"Failed to calculate PR statistics, error: {e}") | ||
| return {} | ||
| return out | ||
| return {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Replacing the detailed PR statistics calculation with an empty dictionary removes functionality. Consider implementing a simplified version of the statistics calculation or handling potential exceptions more gracefully to maintain this feature. [bug]
| return {} | |
| try: | |
| # Simplified statistics calculation or proper exception handling | |
| return {"basic_stat": "value"} | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| get_logger().exception(f"Failed to calculate PR statistics, error: {e}") | |
| return {} |
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Adding a check for publish_output before setting review labels is good for conditional execution. However, consider logging a message when skipping this step for better traceability and debugging. [enhancement]
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | |
| return | |
| if not get_settings().config.publish_output: | |
| get_logger().info("Skipping setting review labels due to publish_output being disabled.") | |
| return |
| @@ -15,5 +15,5 @@ def test_clip(self): | |||
|
|
|||
| max_tokens = 10 | |||
| result = clip_tokens(text, max_tokens) | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli ...(truncated)' | |||
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli\n...(truncated)' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: The expected result in the test case should match the output format of the clip_tokens function. If the newline before the truncation message is removed, update this test accordingly. [bug]
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli\n...(truncated)' | |
| expected_results = 'line1\nline2\nline3\nli ...(truncated)' |
| @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ | |||
| num_output_chars = int(chars_per_token * max_tokens) | |||
| clipped_text = text[:num_output_chars] | |||
| if add_three_dots: | |||
| clipped_text += " ...(truncated)" | |||
| clipped_text += "\n...(truncated)" | |||
| return clipped_text | |||
| except Exception as e: | |||
| get_logger().warning(f"Failed to clip tokens: {e}") | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: When catching a broad exception in the clip_tokens function, consider logging the exception with .exception() instead of .warning() to include the traceback for easier debugging. [best practice]
| get_logger().warning(f"Failed to clip tokens: {e}") | |
| get_logger().exception("Failed to clip tokens", exc_info=True) |
Type
enhancement, bug_fix
Description
calc_pr_statisticsreturn an empty dictionary directly.publish_outputsetting is enabled, enhancing configurability.clip_tokensto align with the new token clipping behavior.Changes walkthrough
utils.py
Improve Text Token Clipping Presentationpr_agent/algo/utils.py
clip_tokensfunction to append a newline before"...(truncated)" when clipping text tokens.
github_provider.py
Simplify PR Statistics Calculationpr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
calc_pr_statisticsfunction, making itreturn an empty dictionary directly.
pr_reviewer.py
Conditional Review Labeling Based on Configurationpr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
publish_outputsetting before settingreview labels.
test_clip_tokens.py
Update Test for Improved Token Clippingtests/unittest/test_clip_tokens.py
clip_tokensto reflect the new line additionbefore "...(truncated)".