Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix duplicate assignment of replicate_key in LiteLLMAIHandler #876

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2024

Conversation

randy-tsukemen
Copy link
Contributor

@randy-tsukemen randy-tsukemen commented Apr 21, 2024

User description

  • Fix duplicate assignment of replicate_key in LiteLLMAIHandler

Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Removed a redundant line that assigned replicate_key twice in LiteLLMAIHandler's constructor.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
litellm_ai_handler.py
Remove duplicate assignment of replicate_key                         

pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/litellm_ai_handler.py

  • Removed duplicate assignment of replicate_key to prevent redundant
    operations.
  • +0/-2     

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (7a9e737)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the PR involves a simple change of removing a duplicate line of code, which is straightforward to review and verify.

    🏅 Score

    95

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review which includes several types of feedbacks, such as possible PR issues, security threats and relevant test in the PR. More feedbacks can be added by configuring the tool.

    The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:
    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Enhancement
    Improve the robustness of the check for 'HUGGINGFACE.API_BASE' in settings.

    Consider using a more robust check for the presence of the 'HUGGINGFACE.API_BASE' key in
    the settings. The current check might fail if the key is present but set to a falsy value
    (like an empty string or None). Using in ensures the key exists regardless of its value.

    pr_agent/algo/ai_handlers/litellm_ai_handler.py [59]

    -if get_settings().get("HUGGINGFACE.API_BASE", None) and 'huggingface' in get_settings().config.model:
    +if "HUGGINGFACE.API_BASE" in get_settings() and 'huggingface' in get_settings().config.model:
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

    • When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:
    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    
    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    

    See the improve usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    @mrT23 mrT23 merged commit 19f239a into Codium-ai:main Apr 21, 2024
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants