You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Use an f-string for constructing the transformed_string to improve readability
To improve readability and maintainability, consider using an f-string for the transformed_string assignment. This will make the code more concise and easier to understand.
Why: The suggestion to use an f-string for transformed_string is valid and improves readability. It's a good practice but not critical for functionality.
7
Readability
Break the long description for key_issues_to_review into multiple lines for better readability
The description for key_issues_to_review is quite long and could be broken into multiple lines for better readability and maintainability.
-key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")+key_issues_to_review: str = Field(+ description=(+ "Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate? "+ "If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'No'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. "+ "Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: '- Possible Bug: ...', etc."+ )+)
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: Breaking the description into multiple lines enhances readability and maintainability, making it easier to manage and update in the future.
6
Clarity
Add a comment to clarify the intention behind setting num_code_suggestions to 0
The num_code_suggestions value has been changed to 0. Ensure this is intentional, as it might disable code suggestions. If the intention is to disable code suggestions, consider adding a comment to clarify this.
-num_code_suggestions=0+num_code_suggestions=0 # Set to 0 to disable code suggestions
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: Adding a comment to explain why num_code_suggestions is set to 0 is a good practice for clarity, especially for maintainers or other developers who might look at the code later.
6
Maintainability
Use OrderedDict to move the key_issues_to_review key to the end of the dictionary
Instead of directly manipulating the dictionary to move the key_issues_to_review key to the end, consider using the OrderedDict from the collections module. This will make the intention clearer and the code more robust.
+from collections import OrderedDict+
if 'key_issues_to_review' in data['review']:
- key_issues_to_review = data['review'].pop('key_issues_to_review')- data['review']['key_issues_to_review'] = key_issues_to_review+ data['review'] = OrderedDict(data['review'])+ data['review'].move_to_end('key_issues_to_review')
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: While using OrderedDict might clarify the intention, the existing method is also correct and Python dictionaries maintain insertion order since Python 3.7. This suggestion is more about style preference.
The action failed because the test test_simple_dictionary_input in the file tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py failed.
The test failed due to an AssertionError.
The expected output from the convert_to_markdown function did not match the actual output.
Relevant error logs:
1: ##[group]Operating System2: Ubuntu
...
988: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_parse_pr_url PASSED [ 13%]989: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_is_valid_codecommit_hostname PASSED [ 14%]990: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_invalid_codecommit_url PASSED [ 16%]991: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_file_extensions PASSED [ 17%]992: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_language_percentages PASSED [ 18%]993: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_get_edit_type PASSED [ 20%]994: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_add_additional_newlines PASSED [ 21%]995: tests/unittest/test_codecommit_provider.py::TestCodeCommitProvider::test_remove_markdown_html PASSED [ 22%]996: tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py::TestConvertToMarkdown::test_simple_dictionary_input FAILED [ 24%]
...
1023: tests/unittest/test_find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file.py::TestFindLineNumberOfRelevantLineInFile::test_relevant_line_found_but_deleted PASSED [ 60%]1024: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions PASSED [ 61%]1025: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_new_line PASSED [ 62%]1026: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_many_close_brackets PASSED [ 64%]1027: tests/unittest/test_fix_output.py::TestTryFixJson::test_incomplete_code_suggestions_relevant_file PASSED [ 65%]1028: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_enabled PASSED [ 66%]1029: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_disabled PASSED [ 68%]1030: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_notset PASSED [ 69%]1031: tests/unittest/test_github_action_output.py::TestGitHubOutput::test_github_action_output_error_case PASSED [ 70%]
...
1046: tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_non_string_before_or_after PASSED [ 90%]1047: tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_no_code_example_key PASSED [ 92%]1048: tests/unittest/test_parse_code_suggestion.py::TestParseCodeSuggestion::test_with_code_example_key PASSED [ 93%]1049: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_valid_yaml PASSED [ 94%]1050: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_add_relevant_line PASSED [ 96%]1051: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_extract_snippet PASSED [ 97%]1052: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_remove_last_line PASSED [ 98%]1053: tests/unittest/test_try_fix_yaml.py::TestTryFixYaml::test_empty_yaml_fixed PASSED [100%]1054: =================================== FAILURES ===================================
...
1058: input_data = {'review': {1059: 'estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]': '1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n',1060: 'relevant_tests': 'No\n', 'possible_issues': 'No\n', 'security_concerns': 'No\n'}, 'code_feedback': [1061: {'relevant_file': '``pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n``', 'language': 'python\n',1062: 'suggestion': "Consider raising an exception or logging a warning when 'pr_url' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of 'pr_url' in instances where it's expected. [important]\n",1063: 'relevant_line': '[return ""](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199)'}]}
1064: expected_output = '## PR Reviewer Guide 🔍\n\n<table>\n<tr>\n<tr><td> ⏱️ <strong>Estimated effort to review [1-5]</strong></td><td>\n\n1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition.\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🧪 <strong>Relevant tests</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> ⚡ <strong>Possible issues</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n<tr><td> 🔒 <strong>Security concerns</strong></td><td>\n\nNo\n\n</td></tr>\n</table>\n\n\n<details><summary> <strong>Code feedback:</strong></summary>\n\n<hr><table><tr><td>relevant file</td><td>pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py\n</td></tr><tr><td>suggestion </td><td>\n\n<strong>\n\nConsider raising an exception or logging a warning when \'pr_url\' attribute is not found. This can help in debugging issues related to the absence of \'pr_url\' in instances where it\'s expected. [important]\n\n</strong>\n</td></tr><tr><td>relevant line</td><td><a href=\'https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent-pro/pull/102/files#diff-52d45f12b836f77ed1aef86e972e65404634ea4e2a6083fb71a9b0f9bb9e062fR199\'>return ""</a></td></tr></table><hr>\n\n</details>'
1065: > assert convert_to_markdown(input_data).strip() == expected_output.strip()1066: E AssertionError: assert '## PR Review...n\n</details>' == '## PR Review...n\n</details>'
...
1068: E 1069: E <table>1070: E <tr>1071: E <tr><td> ⏱️ <strong>Estimated effort to review [1-5]</strong></td><td>1072: E 1073: E 1, because the changes are minimal and straightforward, focusing on a single functionality addition....1074: E 1075: E ...Full output truncated (36 lines hidden), use '-vv' to show1076: tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py:57: AssertionError
...
1078: tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:441079: /app/tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:44: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'1080: monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.ignore, 'regex', ['^file[2-4]\..*$'])1081: tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:651082: /app/tests/unittest/test_file_filter.py:65: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'1083: monkeypatch.setattr(global_settings.ignore, 'regex', ['(((||', '^file[2-4]\..*$'])1084: -- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html1085: =========================== short test summary info ============================1086: FAILED tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py::TestConvertToMarkdown::test_simple_dictionary_input1087: =================== 1 failed, 74 passed, 2 warnings in 2.83s ===================1088: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
✨ CI feedback usage guide:
The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:
Failed stage
Failed test name
Failure summary
Relevant error logs
In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:
where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.
Configuration options
enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.
See more information about the checks tool in the docs.
Use an f-string for string concatenation to improve readability and maintainability
To improve readability and maintainability, consider using an f-string for the transformed_string assignment. This will make the code more concise and easier to understand.
Why: The suggestion to use f-strings improves readability and maintainability significantly, which is important for code clarity and future modifications.
8
Remove spaces before commas in the description to maintain consistency and clarity
The description for estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5] should avoid using spaces before commas to maintain consistency and clarity.
-estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]: int = Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review , 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff.")+estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]: int = Field(description="Estimate, on a scale of 1-5 (inclusive), the time and effort required to review this PR by an experienced and knowledgeable developer. 1 means short and easy review, 5 means long and hard review. Take into account the size, complexity, quality, and the needed changes of the PR code diff.")
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a minor formatting inconsistency in the description of estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]. It's a valid improvement for readability and consistency, though not critical.
6
Remove spaces before question marks in the description to maintain consistency and clarity
The description for key_issues_to_review should avoid using spaces before question marks to maintain consistency and clarity.
-key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")+key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: This suggestion correctly points out a minor formatting issue with the spacing before the question mark in the key_issues_to_review description. It's a valid point for maintaining consistency in punctuation usage.
6
Consistency
Ensure the example output matches the updated field type and description
The example output for estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5] should be an integer without a trailing comma to match the updated field type and description.
Why: This suggestion is crucial as it ensures that the example output matches the updated field type, which is now an integer. This alignment is important for consistency and to avoid potential errors in data handling or interpretation.
8
Maintainability
Add a comment to explain the purpose of setting num_code_suggestions to 0
To avoid confusion and potential misconfigurations, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of setting num_code_suggestions to 0.
+# Set to 0 to disable code suggestions by default
num_code_suggestions=0
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: Adding a comment for clarity on configuration settings is a good practice for maintainability, especially for settings that might not be immediately clear to other developers or future maintainers.
6
Clarity
Rename the field to better align with the terminology used in the description
Consider renaming key_issues_to_review to identified_issues for better clarity and alignment with the terminology used in the description.
-key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")+identified_issues: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: While the suggestion to rename the field might improve clarity slightly, the existing name is not incorrect or misleading. This is a subjective improvement and not a necessity.
-key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")+key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: '- Possible Bug: ...', etc.")
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a grammatical error in the new code added in the PR and provides an accurate correction.
10
Ensure consistent capitalization in the descriptions
Ensure consistency in the use of capitalization in the descriptions. For example, "shortly summarize" should be capitalized to "Shortly summarize" to match the style of other descriptions.
-insights_from_user_answers: str = Field(description="shortly summarize the insights you gained from the user's answers to the questions")+insights_from_user_answers: str = Field(description="Shortly summarize the insights you gained from the user's answers to the questions")
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an inconsistency in capitalization which affects the professionalism and readability of the documentation. This is a good enhancement for maintaining a consistent style.
8
Use a variable for the header level to ensure consistency and ease of adjustment
To ensure consistency in header formatting, consider using a variable for the header level (####) so that it can be easily adjusted if needed.
-updated_header = f"{initial_header}\n\n#### ({name.capitalize()} updated until commit {latest_commit_url})\n"+header_level = "####"+updated_header = f"{initial_header}\n\n{header_level} ({name.capitalize()} updated until commit {latest_commit_url})\n"
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
Why: While the suggestion to use a variable for the header level might improve consistency, it's a minor enhancement and does not address a critical issue or significantly improve the codebase.
5
Enhancement
Use an f-string for constructing the transformed_string to improve readability
To improve readability and maintainability, consider using an f-string for the transformed_string assignment. This will make the code more concise and easier to understand.
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an opportunity to improve code readability by using f-strings, which is a modern Python feature that enhances clarity and maintainability.
7
Simplify the description for key_issues_to_review by removing redundant phrases
The description for key_issues_to_review could be simplified by removing redundant phrases and making it more concise.
-key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns, which the PR reviewer should further investigate ? If there are no apparent issues, respond with 'None'. If there are any issues, describe them briefly. Use bullet points if more than one issue. Be specific, and provide examples if possible. Start each bullet point with a short specific header, such as: "- Possible Bug: ...", etc.")+key_issues_to_review: str = Field(description="Does this PR code introduce issues, bugs, or major performance concerns? If there are no issues, respond with 'None'. If there are issues, describe them briefly using bullet points. Be specific and provide examples. Start each bullet point with a short header, such as: '- Possible Bug: ...', etc.")
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7
Why: The suggestion is valid and improves the readability and conciseness of the description. However, it is not a critical change, so it receives a moderate score.
7
Maintainability
Add a comment to explain the rationale behind setting num_code_suggestions to 0
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of setting num_code_suggestions to 0, as this is a significant change from the previous value of 4.
+# Set to 0 to disable code suggestions by default
num_code_suggestions=0
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6
Why: Adding a comment to explain why num_code_suggestions is set to 0 is a good practice for maintainability and clarity, especially for other developers who might look at the configuration and wonder about the rationale behind this setting.
6
Possible issue
Use OrderedDict to ensure the order of dictionary keys when moving a key to the end
To avoid potential issues with dictionary key ordering, consider using OrderedDict from the collections module when moving the key_issues_to_review key to the end of the dictionary.
+from collections import OrderedDict
if 'key_issues_to_review' in data['review']:
key_issues_to_review = data['review'].pop('key_issues_to_review')
+ data['review'] = OrderedDict(data['review'])
data['review']['key_issues_to_review'] = key_issues_to_review
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3
Why: The suggestion is not necessary because Python 3.7+ maintains the insertion order of dictionaries by default. Using OrderedDict for this purpose is redundant and could introduce unnecessary complexity.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
codiumai-pr-agent-pro
bot
added
documentation
![codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
mrT23
removed
documentation
PR Type
Enhancement, Documentation
Description
utils.py.key_issues_to_reviewin the review dictionary.num_code_suggestionsto 0 in configuration.estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]field type fromstrtointand updated prompt descriptions.Changes walkthrough 📝
utils.py
Update header formatting and section titles in utils.pr_agent/algo/utils.py
emphasize_header.github_provider.py
Change section titles in GitHub provider.pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py
pr_reviewer.py
Update section titles and reorder review dictionary.pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
key_issues_to_reviewto the end of the review dictionary.pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
Update prompt configurations and descriptions.pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml
estimated_effort_to_review_[1-5]field type fromstrtoint.key_issues_to_review.test_convert_to_markdown.py
Update test output for new section title.tests/unittest/test_convert_to_markdown.py
Guide".
configuration.toml
Update configuration for code suggestions.pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml
num_code_suggestionsto 0.