-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feat]:- Prospect Insights Section #3739
Conversation
Employee portal Run #8916
Run Properties:
|
Project |
Employee portal
|
Branch Review |
refs/pull/3739/merge
|
Run status |
Passed #8916
|
Run duration | 00m 25s |
Commit |
70e971c44f ℹ️: Merge b415f2de9c644926d63ba2b36ffc6bdc141c5647 into ddd1e2be236bf46b9ff2ad5c6c44...
|
Committer | Ayush |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
Failures |
0
|
Flaky |
0
|
Pending |
0
|
Skipped |
0
|
Passing |
4
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
Coverage report for commit: b415f2d
Summary - Lines: 3.16% | Methods: 5.43%
🤖 comment via lucassabreu/comment-coverage-clover |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Ayush8923 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new migration for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (20)
Modules/Prospect/Entities/ProspectInsight.php (2)
8-12
: Consider adding validation rules and timestamps configuration.The model could benefit from built-in validation rules and explicit timestamps configuration.
Consider adding these improvements:
class ProspectInsight extends Model { + /** + * Indicates if the model should be timestamped. + * + * @var bool + */ + public $timestamps = true; + + /** + * Validation rules for the model. + * + * @var array<string, string> + */ + public static $rules = [ + 'prospect_id' => 'required|exists:prospects,id', + 'user_id' => 'required|exists:users,id', + 'insight' => 'required|string|max:1000', + ]; // ... existing properties ...
1-7
: Consider adding strict types declaration.For better type safety and code reliability, consider enabling strict types.
Apply this change:
<?php +declare(strict_types=1);
Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/show.blade.php (1)
Line range hint
1-14
: Consider adding error handling for the included view.While the modular approach with subviews is excellent, consider adding a conditional include to gracefully handle cases where the view might be missing during development or deployment.
- @include('prospect::subviews.prospect-insights') + @includeWhen(View::exists('prospect::subviews.prospect-insights'), 'prospect::subviews.prospect-insights')Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/edit-prospect-insights.blade.php (2)
3-5
: Add error handling for form submission.The form lacks proper error handling and success messaging for the user.
- <form action="{{ route('prospect.insights.update', $prospect->id) }}" method="POST"> + <form action="{{ route('prospect.insights.update', $prospect->id) }}" method="POST" id="insightForm"> + @if(session('success')) + <div class="alert alert-success alert-dismissible fade show" role="alert"> + {{ session('success') }} + <button type="button" class="btn-close" data-bs-dismiss="alert" aria-label="Close"></button> + </div> + @endif
11-11
: Improve form submission UX.The submit button could benefit from:
- Loading state indication
- Disabled state during submission
- More descriptive text
- <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary mt-3">Update</button> + <button type="submit" class="btn btn-primary mt-3" id="submitInsight"> + <span class="spinner-border spinner-border-sm d-none" role="status" aria-hidden="true"></span> + <span class="button-text">Save Insights</span> + </button>Consider adding this JavaScript to handle the button state:
document.getElementById('insightForm').addEventListener('submit', function() { const button = document.getElementById('submitInsight'); button.disabled = true; button.querySelector('.spinner-border').classList.remove('d-none'); button.querySelector('.button-text').textContent = 'Saving...'; });Modules/Prospect/Database/Migrations/2024_10_25_220553_prospect-insights.php (1)
32-35
: Consider dropping foreign keys explicitly.While
dropIfExists
will handle the cleanup, it's a good practice to explicitly drop foreign keys in the down method.Apply this diff:
public function down() { + Schema::table('prospect_insights', function (Blueprint $table) { + $table->dropForeign(['user_id']); + $table->dropForeign(['prospect_id']); + }); Schema::dropIfExists('prospect_insights'); }Modules/Prospect/Routes/web.php (1)
22-22
: Consider adding complementary routes for complete CRUD operations.For a complete Prospect Insights feature, consider adding these routes:
Route::put('/{prospect}/insights/update', 'ProspectController@insightsUpdate')->name('prospect.insights.update'); +Route::get('/{prospect}/insights', 'ProspectController@insights')->name('prospect.insights'); +Route::post('/{prospect}/insights', 'ProspectController@insightsStore')->name('prospect.insights.store'); +Route::delete('/{prospect}/insights/{insight}', 'ProspectController@insightsDestroy')->name('prospect.insights.destroy');This would provide a complete set of endpoints for managing insights:
- GET to view insights
- POST to create new insights
- PUT to update insights (already implemented)
- DELETE to remove insights
Modules/Prospect/Entities/Prospect.php (2)
Line range hint
1-52
: Consider separating formatting logic into a dedicated formatter class.The
Prospect
class currently handles both data relationships and formatting logic. This violates the Single Responsibility Principle. Consider moving formatting methods (getFormattedDate
,formattedAmount
) to a dedicatedProspectFormatter
class.Example structure:
// ProspectFormatter.php class ProspectFormatter { public function formatDate($date) { return $date ? Carbon::parse($date)->format('M d, Y') : '-'; } public function formatAmount($amount) { return number_format($amount, 0, '.', ','); } } // Prospect.php class Prospect extends Model { protected $formatter; public function __construct(array $attributes = []) { parent::__construct($attributes); $this->formatter = new ProspectFormatter(); } }
Line range hint
38-46
: Simplify amount formatting using Laravel's number helpers.The current amount formatting logic uses complex string manipulation. Consider using Laravel's built-in
number_format()
helper for better readability and maintainability.- public function formattedAmount($amount) - { - $formattedAmount = preg_replace('/\B(?=(\d{2})+(?!\d))/', ',', substr($amount, 0, -3)) . - ',' . substr($amount, -3); - - return $formattedAmount; - } + public function formattedAmount($amount) + { + return number_format($amount, 0, '.', ','); + }Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/prospect-insights.blade.php (4)
1-10
: Remove duplicate heading for better maintainabilityThe heading "Prospect Insights" appears twice (lines 2 and 9), which violates the DRY principle.
<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights"> <h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights / Learning</h5> <span class="arrow ml-auto">▼</span> </div> <div id="prospect-insights" class="collapse card mt-3"> <div class="panel-body"> <div class="card-body"> <div class="d-flex justify-content-between mb-3"> - <h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights</h5> + <!-- Removed duplicate heading --> </div>
17-19
: Move date formatting logic to an accessorThe date formatting logic should be moved to a model accessor for better maintainability and reusability.
Add this accessor to your ProspectInsight model:
public function getFormattedDateAttribute() { return $this->created_at->format('M d, Y'); }Then update the view:
- <span class="fz-16 font-weight-bold text-muted">{{ \Carbon\Carbon::parse($insight->created_at)->format('M d, Y') }}</span> + <span class="fz-16 font-weight-bold text-muted">{{ $insight->formatted_date }}</span>
24-30
: Enhance empty state messagingThe current empty state message could be more informative and provide guidance to users.
- <h5 class="font-weight-bold">No Insights</h5> + <div class="text-center py-3"> + <h5 class="font-weight-bold mb-2">No Insights Yet</h5> + <p class="text-muted">Add insights about this prospect to help track important information and learnings.</p> + </div>
5-33
: Simplify nested div structureThe current implementation has unnecessary div nesting which makes the code harder to maintain.
<div id="prospect-insights" class="collapse card mt-3"> - <div class="panel-body"> - <div class="card-body"> + <div class="card-body"> <!-- ... content ... --> - </div> </div> </div>Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/edit.blade.php (2)
16-19
: Consider standardizing tab ID naming conventions.The tab IDs use mixed naming conventions:
prospectDetails-tab
(camelCase)prospectComments-tab
(camelCase)prospectInsights-tab
(camelCase)While the current implementation works correctly, consider standardizing to kebab-case (e.g.,
prospect-insights-tab
) for better consistency with HTML conventions.
32-35
: Consider extracting tab structure to a reusable component.The tab structure follows a consistent pattern across all sections. Consider refactoring this into a reusable Blade component to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Example approach:
@component('components.tab-pane') @slot('id', 'prospectInsights') @slot('labelledBy', 'prospectInsights-tab') @include('prospect::subviews.edit-prospect-insights') @endcomponentModules/Prospect/Http/Controllers/ProspectController.php (2)
129-137
: Consider refactoring insights management into separate controllerThe controller is handling multiple responsibilities (prospects, comments, and now insights). Consider extracting insights-related operations into a dedicated
ProspectInsightController
to better adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle.Example refactor:
// New file: Modules/Prospect/Http/Controllers/ProspectInsightController.php class ProspectInsightController extends Controller { protected $service; public function __construct(ProspectService $service) { $this->service = $service; } public function update(Request $request, $prospectId) { $validated = $request->validate([ 'insight_learning' => 'required', ]); $this->service->insightsUpdate($validated, $prospectId); return redirect() ->route('prospect.show', $prospectId) ->with('status', 'Prospect Insights updated successfully!'); } }This would require updating the routes file accordingly.
131-133
: Consider enhancing validation rulesThe current validation only checks if the field is present. Consider adding more specific rules:
- Maximum length constraint
- Content format validation if applicable
Example enhancement:
$validated = $request->validate([ - 'insight_learning' => 'required', + 'insight_learning' => 'required|string|max:1000', ]);Modules/Prospect/Services/ProspectService.php (2)
Line range hint
21-25
: Consider returning the created Prospect entityThe
store
method should return the created Prospect entity for consistency with other methods likecommentUpdate
and to enable method chaining. This also helps with error handling in the calling code.public function store($validated) { $prospect = new Prospect(); $this->saveProspectData($prospect, $validated); + return $prospect; }
59-67
: Add database transaction and error handlingThe method should use a database transaction to ensure data consistency and include proper error handling.
public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id) { + try { + DB::beginTransaction(); + $prospectInsights = new ProspectInsight(); $prospectInsights->prospect_id = $id; $prospectInsights->user_id = auth()->user()->id; $prospectInsights->insight_learning = $validated['insight_learning']; $prospectInsights->save(); + + DB::commit(); + return $prospectInsights; + } catch (\Exception $e) { + DB::rollBack(); + throw $e; + } }Modules/User/Entities/User.php (1)
261-264
: Consider adding PHPDoc and reorganizing method placement.For better code organization and documentation:
- Add PHPDoc comment for consistency with other methods
- Consider moving this method closer to other prospect-related methods (like
prospects()
andprospectsComments()
)+ /** + * Get the prospect insights associated with the user. + * + * @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\HasMany + */ public function prospectInsights() { return $this->hasMany(ProspectInsight::class); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
Modules/Prospect/Database/Migrations/2024_10_25_220553_prospect-insights.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Entities/Prospect.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Entities/ProspectInsight.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Http/Controllers/ProspectController.php
(3 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/edit.blade.php
(2 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/edit-prospect-insights.blade.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/prospect-insights.blade.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/show.blade.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Routes/web.php
(1 hunks)Modules/Prospect/Services/ProspectService.php
(2 hunks)Modules/User/Entities/User.php
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/show.blade.php (1)
12-12
: LGTM! Clean integration of prospect insights.
The placement of the insights section after details and comments follows a logical flow in the UI.
Let's verify the existence of the included view file:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The prospect-insights view exists and is properly organized
The prospect-insights.blade.php
file is present in the correct location at Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/
, confirming that the include statement will work as expected. The modular organization with subviews is maintained.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of prospect-insights view file
# Expected: Find the view file in the modules directory
fd -t f "prospect-insights.blade.php" Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/
Length of output: 225
Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/subviews/edit-prospect-insights.blade.php (1)
1-14
: Verify the integration with parent view.
The template appears to be a subview. Let's verify its integration with the parent view and the presence of required JavaScript dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Integration looks good, but form needs CSRF protection verification
The subview is properly integrated within the parent view's tab structure and inherits the master layout with Bootstrap dependencies. However, let's verify one final security aspect:
The subview integration is properly implemented
The verification confirms that:
- The subview is correctly integrated within the tabbed interface of the parent view (
edit.blade.php
) - Bootstrap dependencies are available through the main app layout
- CSRF protection is properly configured through the framework's middleware
- The form includes the required
@csrf
directive for security
The implementation follows best practices with:
- Proper template inheritance chain (
subview -> edit.blade.php -> prospect::layouts.master -> layouts.app
) - Clean separation of concerns with modular views
- Appropriate form security measures
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of this subview and its dependencies
# Test 1: Check how this subview is included in the parent view
echo "Checking parent view integration..."
rg -l "@include.*edit-prospect-insights" --type blade
# Test 2: Verify Bootstrap CSS/JS inclusion
echo "Checking Bootstrap dependencies..."
rg -l "bootstrap.*\.(css|js)" --type blade
# Test 3: Look for any existing JavaScript that might conflict
echo "Checking for potential JS conflicts..."
rg "insightForm|submitInsight" --type js
Length of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the integration points and dependencies
# Check for any blade/php files that might include our subview
echo "Checking for files including our subview..."
rg -l "edit-prospect-insights"
# Look for layout files that might contain Bootstrap
echo "Checking layout files..."
fd "layout" --extension php --extension blade
# Check for asset inclusion in layout files
echo "Checking asset inclusions..."
rg -l "asset.*bootstrap"
# Look for any JavaScript related to insights
echo "Checking for insight-related JavaScript..."
fd . --extension js | xargs rg -l "insight"
Length of output: 553
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the parent view and layout structure
# Check the content of the parent view that includes our subview
echo "Content of edit.blade.php:"
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/edit.blade.php"
# Check the content of the layout file
echo -e "\nContent of layout file:"
cat "resources/views/errors/layout.blade.php"
# Look for any app.js or main layout that might contain Bootstrap
echo -e "\nChecking for main app files:"
fd "app" --extension js --extension php --extension blade
# Look for any prospect-related JavaScript
echo -e "\nChecking for prospect JavaScript files:"
fd . --extension js | grep -i "prospect"
Length of output: 15049
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the master layout and prospect JavaScript
# Check the master layout referenced in edit.blade.php
echo "Checking prospect master layout:"
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/views/layouts/master.blade.php"
# Check the prospect JavaScript for any form handling
echo -e "\nChecking prospect JavaScript implementation:"
cat "Modules/Prospect/Resources/assets/js/app.js"
# Check main app layout for Bootstrap dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking main app layout:"
cat "resources/views/layouts/app.blade.php"
Length of output: 8825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify CSRF protection in the parent templates
# Check if CSRF verification middleware is properly set up
echo "Checking CSRF middleware configuration:"
rg -l "VerifyCsrfToken" --type php
# Look for CSRF token verification in prospect routes
echo -e "\nChecking prospect routes:"
fd routes.php --exec cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "prospect.insights"
Length of output: 316
Modules/Prospect/Routes/web.php (1)
22-22
: LGTM! The route follows RESTful conventions and existing patterns.
The new route is well-structured, follows naming conventions, and integrates seamlessly with the existing routes.
Modules/Prospect/Entities/Prospect.php (1)
49-52
: LGTM! The relationship method is well-implemented.
The insights()
relationship follows Laravel's conventions and is consistent with other relationship methods in the class.
Modules/Prospect/Http/Controllers/ProspectController.php (2)
61-63
: LGTM: Improved response handling in store method
The change from returning service result to using a redirect with success message follows Laravel best practices for form submissions.
72-72
: LGTM: Efficient eager loading of relationships
Good use of eager loading for both comments and insights to prevent N+1 query problems.
Modules/Prospect/Services/ProspectService.php (1)
8-8
: LGTM! Import follows PSR-4 standard
Modules/User/Entities/User.php (1)
261-264
: LGTM! The relationship implementation looks good.
The prospectInsights()
relationship method follows Laravel conventions and properly establishes the one-to-many relationship with ProspectInsight.
class ProspectInsight extends Model | ||
{ | ||
protected $fillable = []; | ||
|
||
protected $table = 'prospect_insights'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Define mass-assignable attributes in $fillable property.
The empty $fillable
array is a security concern as it doesn't specify which attributes can be mass-assigned. This could lead to mass assignment vulnerabilities.
Apply this diff to explicitly define the fillable attributes:
- protected $fillable = [];
+ protected $fillable = [
+ 'prospect_id',
+ 'user_id',
+ 'insight',
+ 'created_at',
+ 'updated_at'
+ ];
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
class ProspectInsight extends Model | ||
{ | ||
protected $fillable = []; | ||
|
||
protected $table = 'prospect_insights'; | ||
|
||
public function prospect() | ||
{ | ||
return $this->belongsTo(Prospect::class); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public function user() | ||
{ | ||
return $this->belongsTo(User::class); | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add PHPDoc blocks and type hints for better code documentation.
The class and its methods lack proper documentation and type hints. This reduces code maintainability and IDE support.
Apply these improvements:
+ /**
+ * ProspectInsight Model
+ *
+ * Represents insights or learnings associated with a prospect.
+ */
class ProspectInsight extends Model
{
// ... existing properties ...
+ /**
+ * Get the prospect associated with this insight.
+ *
+ * @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\BelongsTo<Prospect>
+ */
public function prospect()
{
- return $this->belongsTo(Prospect::class);
+ return $this->belongsTo(Prospect::class, 'prospect_id');
}
+ /**
+ * Get the user who created this insight.
+ *
+ * @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\BelongsTo<User>
+ */
public function user()
{
- return $this->belongsTo(User::class);
+ return $this->belongsTo(User::class, 'user_id');
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
class ProspectInsight extends Model | |
{ | |
protected $fillable = []; | |
protected $table = 'prospect_insights'; | |
public function prospect() | |
{ | |
return $this->belongsTo(Prospect::class); | |
} | |
public function user() | |
{ | |
return $this->belongsTo(User::class); | |
} | |
} | |
/** | |
* ProspectInsight Model | |
* | |
* Represents insights or learnings associated with a prospect. | |
*/ | |
class ProspectInsight extends Model | |
{ | |
protected $fillable = []; | |
protected $table = 'prospect_insights'; | |
/** | |
* Get the prospect associated with this insight. | |
* | |
* @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\BelongsTo<Prospect> | |
*/ | |
public function prospect() | |
{ | |
return $this->belongsTo(Prospect::class, 'prospect_id'); | |
} | |
/** | |
* Get the user who created this insight. | |
* | |
* @return \Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Relations\BelongsTo<User> | |
*/ | |
public function user() | |
{ | |
return $this->belongsTo(User::class, 'user_id'); | |
} | |
} |
<label for="insight_learning" class="mb-4">Insights / Learning</label> | ||
<textarea name="insight_learning" id="insight_learning" class="form-control" rows="10" | ||
placeholder="Enter your insights and learning here..." style="resize: vertical;"></textarea> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance form field accessibility and validation.
The textarea implementation could benefit from several improvements:
- Missing required/optional field indication
- No validation feedback mechanism
- No character limit specified
- Missing aria-label for better screen reader support
- <label for="insight_learning" class="mb-4">Insights / Learning</label>
- <textarea name="insight_learning" id="insight_learning" class="form-control" rows="10"
- placeholder="Enter your insights and learning here..." style="resize: vertical;"></textarea>
+ <label for="insight_learning" class="mb-4">Insights / Learning <span class="text-muted">(required)</span></label>
+ <textarea
+ name="insight_learning"
+ id="insight_learning"
+ class="form-control @error('insight_learning') is-invalid @enderror"
+ rows="10"
+ maxlength="1000"
+ required
+ aria-label="Prospect insights and learning"
+ placeholder="Enter your insights and learning here..."
+ style="resize: vertical;">{{ old('insight_learning', $prospect->insight->insight_learning ?? '') }}</textarea>
+ @error('insight_learning')
+ <div class="invalid-feedback">{{ $message }}</div>
+ @enderror
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<label for="insight_learning" class="mb-4">Insights / Learning</label> | |
<textarea name="insight_learning" id="insight_learning" class="form-control" rows="10" | |
placeholder="Enter your insights and learning here..." style="resize: vertical;"></textarea> | |
<label for="insight_learning" class="mb-4">Insights / Learning <span class="text-muted">(required)</span></label> | |
<textarea | |
name="insight_learning" | |
id="insight_learning" | |
class="form-control @error('insight_learning') is-invalid @enderror" | |
rows="10" | |
maxlength="1000" | |
required | |
aria-label="Prospect insights and learning" | |
placeholder="Enter your insights and learning here..." | |
style="resize: vertical;">{{ old('insight_learning', $prospect->insight->insight_learning ?? '') }}</textarea> | |
@error('insight_learning') | |
<div class="invalid-feedback">{{ $message }}</div> | |
@enderror |
<?php | ||
|
||
use Illuminate\Database\Migrations\Migration; | ||
use Illuminate\Database\Schema\Blueprint; | ||
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema; | ||
|
||
class ProspectInsights extends Migration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add namespace and fix class naming convention.
The migration file should follow Laravel's module namespace convention and naming standards:
Apply this diff:
<?php
+namespace Modules\Prospect\Database\Migrations;
+
use Illuminate\Database\Migrations\Migration;
use Illuminate\Database\Schema\Blueprint;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema;
-class ProspectInsights extends Migration
+class CreateProspectInsightsTable extends Migration
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<?php | |
use Illuminate\Database\Migrations\Migration; | |
use Illuminate\Database\Schema\Blueprint; | |
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema; | |
class ProspectInsights extends Migration | |
<?php | |
namespace Modules\Prospect\Database\Migrations; | |
use Illuminate\Database\Migrations\Migration; | |
use Illuminate\Database\Schema\Blueprint; | |
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Schema; | |
class CreateProspectInsightsTable extends Migration |
Schema::create('prospect_insights', function (Blueprint $table) { | ||
$table->bigIncrements('id'); | ||
$table->unsignedBigInteger('prospect_id'); | ||
$table->integer('user_id')->unsigned(); | ||
$table->longText('insight_learning'); | ||
$table->timestamps(); | ||
$table->foreign('user_id')->references('id')->on('users')->onDelete('cascade'); | ||
$table->foreign('prospect_id')->references('id')->on('prospects')->onDelete('cascade'); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance table schema for better consistency, performance, and data integrity.
Several improvements can be made to the table schema:
Apply this diff:
Schema::create('prospect_insights', function (Blueprint $table) {
$table->bigIncrements('id');
$table->unsignedBigInteger('prospect_id');
- $table->integer('user_id')->unsigned();
+ $table->unsignedBigInteger('user_id');
- $table->longText('insight_learning');
+ $table->longText('insight_learning')->nullable(false);
$table->timestamps();
+ $table->softDeletes();
+
+ // Add indexes for better query performance
+ $table->index(['prospect_id', 'user_id']);
+
$table->foreign('user_id')->references('id')->on('users')->onDelete('cascade');
$table->foreign('prospect_id')->references('id')->on('prospects')->onDelete('cascade');
});
Changes explained:
- Changed
user_id
tobigInteger
for consistency with other IDs - Added
nullable(false)
to ensure insight_learning is always provided - Added
softDeletes()
for better data tracking - Added composite index for common query patterns
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Schema::create('prospect_insights', function (Blueprint $table) { | |
$table->bigIncrements('id'); | |
$table->unsignedBigInteger('prospect_id'); | |
$table->integer('user_id')->unsigned(); | |
$table->longText('insight_learning'); | |
$table->timestamps(); | |
$table->foreign('user_id')->references('id')->on('users')->onDelete('cascade'); | |
$table->foreign('prospect_id')->references('id')->on('prospects')->onDelete('cascade'); | |
}); | |
Schema::create('prospect_insights', function (Blueprint $table) { | |
$table->bigIncrements('id'); | |
$table->unsignedBigInteger('prospect_id'); | |
$table->unsignedBigInteger('user_id'); | |
$table->longText('insight_learning')->nullable(false); | |
$table->timestamps(); | |
$table->softDeletes(); | |
// Add indexes for better query performance | |
$table->index(['prospect_id', 'user_id']); | |
$table->foreign('user_id')->references('id')->on('users')->onDelete('cascade'); | |
$table->foreign('prospect_id')->references('id')->on('prospects')->onDelete('cascade'); | |
}); |
$table->foreign('user_id')->references('id')->on('users')->onDelete('cascade'); | ||
$table->foreign('prospect_id')->references('id')->on('prospects')->onDelete('cascade'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
There's a mismatch in the ID column types between the referenced tables:
users
table usesincrements('id')
(32-bit integer)prospects
table usesbigIncrements('id')
(64-bit integer)- The foreign key in
prospect-insights
is trying to reference these mismatched columns
This could lead to data integrity issues when the foreign key constraints are enforced. To maintain consistency:
- Either update the
users
table to usebigIncrements
- Or update both
prospects
andprospect-insights
tables to use regularincrements
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify referenced table schemas.
Let's ensure the referenced tables have compatible column types.
Let me verify the column types in the referenced tables to ensure compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the referenced tables exist and have compatible column types
# Check for users table migration
echo "Checking users table migration..."
rg -l "Schema::create\('users'" --type php
# Check for prospects table migration
echo "Checking prospects table migration..."
rg -l "Schema::create\('prospects'" --type php
# Check ID column types in both tables
echo "Checking ID column types..."
rg "table->bigIncrements\('id'\)" --type php
Length of output: 6785
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the column types in users table
echo "Checking users table schema..."
rg -A 5 "Schema::create\('users'" --type php
# Check the column types in prospects table
echo "Checking prospects table schema..."
rg -A 5 "Schema::create\('prospects'" --type php
Length of output: 1612
<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights"> | ||
<h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights / Learning</h5> | ||
<span class ="arrow ml-auto">▼</span> | ||
</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance accessibility of the collapse toggle
The Unicode arrow (▼) should be replaced with an accessible icon, and proper ARIA attributes should be added to the toggle element.
-<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights">
+<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights" role="button" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="prospect-insights">
<h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights / Learning</h5>
- <span class="arrow ml-auto">▼</span>
+ <span class="arrow ml-auto" aria-hidden="true">
+ <i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i>
+ </span>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights"> | |
<h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights / Learning</h5> | |
<span class ="arrow ml-auto">▼</span> | |
</div> | |
<div class="card-header d-flex mt-5" data-toggle="collapse" data-target="#prospect-insights" role="button" aria-expanded="false" aria-controls="prospect-insights"> | |
<h5 class="font-weight-bold">Prospect Insights / Learning</h5> | |
<span class="arrow ml-auto" aria-hidden="true"> | |
<i class="fa fa-chevron-down"></i> | |
</span> | |
</div> |
<img src="{{ $insight->user->avatar }}" alt="User" class="rounded-circle mr-5" | ||
width="50" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="top" title={{ $insight->user->name }}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix potential XSS vulnerability in tooltip
The user name is directly output in the title attribute without escaping, which could lead to XSS attacks.
- <img src="{{ $insight->user->avatar }}" alt="User" class="rounded-circle mr-5"
- width="50" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="top" title={{ $insight->user->name }}>
+ <img src="{{ $insight->user->avatar }}" alt="User avatar for {{ e($insight->user->name) }}"
+ class="rounded-circle mr-5" width="50" data-toggle="tooltip"
+ data-placement="top" title="{{ e($insight->user->name) }}">
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<img src="{{ $insight->user->avatar }}" alt="User" class="rounded-circle mr-5" | |
width="50" data-toggle="tooltip" data-placement="top" title={{ $insight->user->name }}> | |
<img src="{{ $insight->user->avatar }}" alt="User avatar for {{ e($insight->user->name) }}" | |
class="rounded-circle mr-5" width="50" data-toggle="tooltip" | |
data-placement="top" title="{{ e($insight->user->name) }}"> |
$validated = $request->validate([ | ||
'insight_learning' => 'required', | ||
]); | ||
$this->service->insightsUpdate($validated, $id); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Error handling needed in both controller and service layers
The service method insightsUpdate
performs database operations without any error handling, and the controller doesn't catch potential exceptions. This could lead to unhandled database errors and poor user experience.
Modules/Prospect/Services/ProspectService.php
: Add try-catch ininsightsUpdate
method for database operationsModules/Prospect/Http/Controllers/ProspectController.php
: Add error handling as suggested in the review
// Service layer
public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id)
{
+ try {
$prospectInsights = new ProspectInsight();
$prospectInsights->prospect_id = $id;
$prospectInsights->user_id = auth()->user()->id;
$prospectInsights->insight_learning = $validated['insight_learning'];
$prospectInsights->save();
+ } catch (\Exception $e) {
+ throw new \RuntimeException('Failed to save prospect insights: ' . $e->getMessage());
+ }
}
// Controller layer
try {
$this->service->insightsUpdate($validated, $id);
return redirect()->route('prospect.show', $id)->with('status', 'Prospect Insights updated successfully!');
} catch (\Exception $e) {
return redirect()
->route('prospect.show', $id)
->with('error', 'Failed to update prospect insights: ' . $e->getMessage());
}
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify error handling in service layer
The service method call should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions gracefully.
Consider adding error handling:
-$this->service->insightsUpdate($validated, $id);
+try {
+ $this->service->insightsUpdate($validated, $id);
+} catch (\Exception $e) {
+ return redirect()
+ ->route('prospect.show', $id)
+ ->with('error', 'Failed to update prospect insights: ' . $e->getMessage());
+}
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the service method includes error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'function insightsUpdate($_) {
try {
$$$
} catch ($_) {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the service method exists and see its implementation
rg -g "*.php" "function insightsUpdate" -A 10
# Also check the controller's error handling pattern for other methods
rg -g "*.php" "class ProspectController" -A 50
Length of output: 6117
public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id) | ||
{ | ||
$prospectInsights = new ProspectInsight(); | ||
$prospectInsights->prospect_id = $id; | ||
$prospectInsights->user_id = auth()->user()->id; | ||
$prospectInsights->insight_learning = $validated['insight_learning']; | ||
$prospectInsights->save(); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to reduce code duplication with commentUpdate
The insightsUpdate
method follows a similar pattern to commentUpdate
. Consider creating a generic method for creating prospect-related entities to reduce duplication.
- public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id)
- {
- $prospectInsights = new ProspectInsight();
- $prospectInsights->prospect_id = $id;
- $prospectInsights->user_id = auth()->user()->id;
- $prospectInsights->insight_learning = $validated['insight_learning'];
- $prospectInsights->save();
- }
+ private function createProspectEntity($entityClass, $prospectId, $data, $contentField)
+ {
+ $entity = new $entityClass();
+ $entity->prospect_id = $prospectId;
+ $entity->user_id = auth()->user()->id;
+ $entity->$contentField = $data[$contentField];
+ $entity->save();
+ return $entity;
+ }
+
+ public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id)
+ {
+ return $this->createProspectEntity(
+ ProspectInsight::class,
+ $id,
+ $validated,
+ 'insight_learning'
+ );
+ }
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
💡 Codebase verification
Verify prospect existence before creating insight
The review suggestion is valid for the following reasons:
- The foreign key constraint exists in the migration, which will cause a database error if an invalid prospect_id is provided
- The controller only validates the 'insight_learning' field
- The model has a proper belongsTo relationship with Prospect
- No existence check is performed before creating the insight
The suggested refactor using findOrFail
is a good practice as it will:
- Fail early with a 404 exception instead of a database constraint error
- Validate prospect existence at the application level
- Follow Laravel's convention for handling non-existent resources
- Make the code more maintainable and explicit about its requirements
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify prospect existence before creating insight
The method should verify that the prospect exists before creating an insight.
public function insightsUpdate($validated, $id)
{
+ $prospect = Prospect::findOrFail($id);
$prospectInsights = new ProspectInsight();
- $prospectInsights->prospect_id = $id;
+ $prospectInsights->prospect_id = $prospect->id;
$prospectInsights->user_id = auth()->user()->id;
$prospectInsights->insight_learning = $validated['insight_learning'];
$prospectInsights->save();
+ return $prospectInsights;
}
Let me check if there's any validation in the controller or related request classes.
Let me also check if there's a foreign key constraint on the prospect_id column.
And let me verify if there's any model relationship defined:
Let me check the model relationships using ripgrep since ast-grep didn't work:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's proper validation in the controller
rg -A 5 "insightsUpdate.*validate" app/ Modules/
Length of output: 1085
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for validation in controller and request classes
rg -B 5 "insightsUpdate.*validate|function validate.*insight" Modules/Prospect/
Length of output: 1050
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for foreign key constraint in migration files
rg -B 5 "foreign.*prospect_id.*prospects" Modules/Prospect/
Length of output: 1705
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for model relationships
ast-grep --pattern 'class ProspectInsight extends Model {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for model relationships in ProspectInsight model
rg -A 10 "class ProspectInsight" Modules/Prospect/
# Also check for any uses of findOrFail in the codebase for similar patterns
rg "findOrFail.*prospect" Modules/Prospect/
Length of output: 1921
Description
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Enhancements
These updates aim to improve the management and visibility of insights related to prospects, enhancing user interaction and data handling.